Pacific B usiness R eview (International)

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management Indexed With Web of Science(ESCI)
ISSN: 0974-438X
Impact factor (SJIF):8.764
RNI No.:RAJENG/2016/70346
Postal Reg. No.: RJ/UD/29-136/2017-2019
Editorial Board

Prof. B. P. Sharma
(Principal Editor in Chief)

Prof. Dipin Mathur
(Consultative Editor)

Dr. Khushbu Agarwal
(Editor in Chief)

Editorial Team

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management

The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Brand Loyalty among Gen Z Consumers: An Analytical and Comparative Study of Delhi and Mumbai

 

Sweta Saxena

Associate Professor,

Dean - Academic Affairs,

College of Management Studies, Kanpur

 

Dr. Evelina Brajesh Sahay

Bharati Vidyapeeth

(Deemed to be University),

Department of Management Studies,

Navi Mumbai

 

Dr. Manisha

Assistant Professor,

Department of commerce,

Delhi School of Economics,

University of Delhi

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-7857

 

Dr. A. Udaya Shankar

Associate Professor,

K L Business School,

Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation,

A Deemed to be University,

Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India

 

Dr Manoj Kumar

Assistant Professor,

Amity University Rajasthan

ORCID-0000-0002-8894-529X

 

Abstract

The emergence of social media has completely changed the marketing landscape with social media influencers becoming increasingly potent in influencing consumer behaviour, especially among Generation Z (Gen Z), This study's main goal was to investigate how social media influencers affect Gen Z consumers' brand loyalty. Further, the research also compared the results for Delhi and Mumbai. The sample of the study consisted of 279 Gen Z consumers of Delhi and 328 Gen Z consumers of Mumbai, in total 607 respondents were included in the sample. The data was collected with the help of a structured questionnaire. The results revealed that Instagram is the most popular social media among Gen Z consumers and on average they spent 2 to 4 hours on various social media platforms. Consumers regularly follow influencers and often make purchases due to social media influence. The results highlighted that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty. A significant difference was observed in the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai.

Keywords: Social media influencer, Brand loyalty, Gen Z

Introduction:

In recent years, social media has transformed the landscape of marketing and consumer engagement, particularly among Generation Z (Gen Z), a demographic characterized by its digital nativity and distinct consumer behaviours, Social media influencers have become crucial players in influencing consumer choices and brand impressions as platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok continue to grow (Selezneva, 2024). This study examines how social media influencers affect brand loyalty, especially among Gen Z customers. —an increasingly important demographic characterized by their digital savviness and distinct consumer behaviours.

Born roughly between 1997 and 2012, Generation Z is a generation that grew up in a time when social media and technology were prevalent. One characteristic of this generation is its heavy reliance on social media for connection, entertainment, and information. Unlike previous generations, Gen Z consumers value authenticity, transparency, and relatability in their interactions with brands. Research highlights that Gen Z is more likely to trust influencers perceived as genuine rather than traditional advertising, driving higher levels of engagement and brand loyalty (Djafarova&Rushworth, 2017).As a result, the rise of social media influencers—individuals who leverage their online presence to promote products and services—has become a pivotal element in shaping brand loyalty among these consumers. Influencers often cultivate a sense of community and trust with their followers, which can significantly impact brand perceptions and purchasing decisions (Valmohammadi et al., 2024). This phenomenon raises critical questions about the dynamics of influence, the authenticity of endorsements, and the overall effectiveness of influencer marketing strategies in fostering long-term brand loyalty.

Through this study, we aim to explore the intricate relationship between social media influencers and Gen Z consumers, examining how influencers affect brand loyalty, the factors that contribute to this influence, and the implications for brands seeking to engage effectively with this unique demographic. By comprehending these characteristics Brands can create more appealing marketing tactics that appeal to Generation Z, ultimately enhancing brand loyalty and driving consumer engagement.

Review of Literature

The emergence of social media platforms has given rise to influencers who possess the ability to reach large audiences and engage them in meaningful ways. Influencers are often seen as relatable figures who embody the values and lifestyles that resonate with their followers (Abdullahi&Otori, 2020). Their perceived authenticity and personal connections with audiences differentiate them from traditional advertising methods (Ahmed et al., 2024).

A significant body of research highlights the importance of credibility and trust in influencer marketing. Studies suggest that consumers are more likely to develop brand loyalty when they perceive influencers as trustworthy and credible sources (Ahmed, Islam & Ghaffar, 2024). Influencer credibility is often derived from expertise, attractiveness, and reliability. When influencers share genuine experiences with a brand, they can foster emotional connections that enhance loyalty (Aisyah, 2023).

Social media influencers excel in creating engaged communities around their content. Engaged followers often feel a sense of belonging and loyalty not only to the influencer but also to the brands they endorse. Research indicates that high levels of engagement, such as likes, shares, and comments, positively correlate with consumer loyalty to the endorsed brands (Çelik, 2022). This sense of community is particularly relevant for Generation Z, who prioritize social interaction and peer validation in their purchasing decisions.

The alignment between influencer values and brand identity plays a crucial role in shaping brand loyalty. When influencers authentically embody the essence of a brand, they can reinforce brand image and resonate with consumers’ self-concepts (Es-Safi, 2022). Conversely, mismatches between influencer personas and brand messages can lead to consumer scepticism and diminished loyalty.

Content quality and authenticity are paramount in influencer marketing. Studies suggest that consumers respond more positively to organic, relatable content compared to polished advertisements (Jun and Yi, 2020). Authentic storytelling and transparency about brand partnerships can enhance consumer trust and loyalty. This is especially critical for Gen Z, who are adept at discerning authenticity in digital communications.

Cultural context and social dynamics also influence the effectiveness of influencer marketing. Influencers often act as cultural intermediaries, shaping consumer perceptions across different demographics and markets. Research indicates that influencers can bridge cultural gaps and promote inclusivity, which can further solidify brand loyalty among diverse consumer groups (Mehrabi, 2014).

Despite the benefits, challenges such as influencer fraud, saturation of the influencer market, and ethical concerns regarding transparency can undermine the efficacy of influencer marketing. Studies emphasize the need for ethical practices, including clear disclosure of paid partnerships, to maintain consumer trust and brand integrity (Markethub,, 2016).

The literature underscores that as brands continue to navigate the evolving digital landscape, understanding the dynamics of influencer marketing and its impact on consumer behaviour will be crucial for developing effective strategies that foster long-term loyalty. This helps in identifying the enduring effects of influencer partnerships and exploring the implications of emerging social media trends on brand loyalty.

Research gap

While much research has addressed influencer marketing broadly, there is a paucity of studies specifically targeting Generation Z. This demographic has unique characteristics, values, and behaviours that differentiate it from previous generations. Further research is needed to explore how these factors specifically influence their responses to social media influencers and, consequently, their brand loyalty. Research exploring how influencers impact brand loyalty among Gen Z consumers is limited.

Objectives

  1. To study the social media usage of Gen Z consumers
  2. To discuss the influencer engagement of Gen Z consumers
  3. To check the impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence.
  4. To study the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers
  5. To compare the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai

Hypotheses

  1. There is no significant impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence.
  2. There is no significant difference in impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai

Methodology

This paper is intended to check the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers so causal research design is used.

Sampling: The population frame included the Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai, so by using convenience sampling 279 consumers of Delhi and 328 consumers of Mumbai were included in the present study.

Data Collection: Data was collected by using a close-ended questionnaire which was divided into 5 sections i.e. (a) demographic profile (b) social media usage (c) influencer engagement (d) brand interaction (e) impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty.

Statistical Analysis: The data has been analyzed in SPSS 21.0. For interpretation percentage analysis, a two-sample t-test and chi-square test were used.

Results

Demographic Profile

In the beginning of questionnaire Gen Z Consumers were asked to indicate their demographic profile as shown Table 1

  • Gender of Gen Z Consumers: Out of the total Gen Z Consumers57.30% (N=348) were males and rests were females (N=259, Percentage=42.70). In both the cities more males (Delhi=52.30%, Mumbai=61.60%) were included in the sample as compared to the females (Delhi=47.70%, Mumbai=38.40%)
  • Age of Gen Z Consumers: The current age of Gen Z consumers varies from 20 to 27 years so they were subdivided into two groups i.e. consumers in the age group of 20 to 23 years (44.20%) and consumers in the age group of 24 to 27 years (55.80%).
  • Occupation status of Gen Z Consumers: In Delhi 36.20% consumers were students, 26.50% consumers were unemployed and 37.30% consumers were employed. In Mumbai these percentages were 26.50%, 35.70% and 37.80% respectively. Overall in sample 31% consumers were students, 31.50% consumers were unemployed and 37.50 consumers were employed.

Table 1: Demographic Profile of Gen Z Consumers

Gender

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Male

146

52.3

202

61.6

348

57.3

Female

133

47.7

126

38.4

259

42.7

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

Age Group

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

20 to 23 Years

121

43.4

147

44.8

268

44.2

24 to 27 Years

158

56.6

181

55.2

339

55.8

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

Occupation Status

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Student

101

36.2

87

26.5

188

31.0

Unemployed

74

26.5

117

35.7

191

31.5

Employed

104

37.3

124

37.8

228

37.5

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

 

Social Media Usage of Gen Z Consumers

As per the data shown in Table 2, all Gen Z consumers used Instagram. The next three popular social media platforms after Instagram were Facebook (91.10%), YouTube (89.30%) and Twitter (83.70%). If we compare the percentages of the two sample cities, then it can be concluded that Gen Z consumers of Mumbai were more active on social media platforms as compared to the Gen Z consumers of Delhi.

Further respondents were asked to indicate the average time spent by them on social media platforms and it was found that the majority of consumers are spending 2 to 4 hours on social media (37.10%) followed by more than 4 hours (31%) and 1 to 2 hours (26.50%).

 

Table 2: Social Media Usage of Gen Z Consumers

Social Media Platform

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Instagram

279

100.0

328

100.0

607

100.0

YouTube

241

86.4

301

91.8

542

89.3

Twitter

232

83.2

276

84.1

508

83.7

Facebook

248

88.9

305

93.0

553

91.1

Average Per day Use

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Less than 1 hour

11

3.9

22

6.7

33

5.4

1-2 hours

87

31.2

74

22.6

161

26.5

2-4 hours

124

44.4

101

30.8

225

37.1

More than 4 hours

57

20.4

131

39.9

188

31.0

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

 

Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers

Gen Z consumers were asked how frequently they follow influencers and as a response majority of consumers of Delhi (47.30%) and Mumbai (49.40%) said that they follow influencers on weekly basis. A significant number of consumers (Delhi=36.20%, Mumbai=37.10%) highlighted the daily following of influencers.

When asked about the type of influences followed, the majority of respondents (71.30%) said that they follow fitness influencers followed by fashion influencers (70.20%) and travel influencers (63.10%). It could be observed that a maximum number of Delhi consumers (72%) follow fitness influencers whereas the maximum number of Mumbai consumers (75.30%) follow fashion influencers.

The popularity of influencers keeps on changing and new influencers also emerge in market so consumers were asked that how do they usually discover new influencers. As a result it was observed that majority of Delhi (76.30%) and Mumbai consumers (90.90%) follow new influencers due to social media algorithms. Overall 64.30% consumers said that they follow new influencers based on the recommendation received from friends

Table 3: Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers

Frequency of following influencer

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Daily

101

36.2

124

37.8

225

37.1

Weekly

132

47.3

162

49.4

294

48.4

Monthly

25

9.0

37

11.3

62

10.2

Rarely

21

7.5

5

1.5

26

4.3

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

Type of Influencer

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Fashion

179

64.2

247

75.3

426

70.2

Beauty

154

55.2

201

61.3

355

58.5

Fitness

201

72.0

232

70.7

433

71.3

Gaming

101

36.2

147

44.8

248

40.9

Travel

124

44.4

259

79.0

383

63.1

Food

154

55.2

200

61.0

354

58.3

Source

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Recommendations from friends

148

53.0

242

73.8

390

64.3

Social media algorithms

213

76.3

298

90.9

511

84.2

Sponsored ads

101

36.2

154

47.0

255

42.0

Other

42

15.1

51

15.5

93

15.3

 

Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers

Gen Z consumers were asked how often they make purchases influenced by social media and as a response, it was found that approximately half of the consumers (49.40%) often make purchases influenced by social media. 20.3% of consumers indicated that they always make purchases influenced by social media whereas 26.20% of consumers said that they sometimes make purchases influenced by social media. Individually 50.50% of consumers in Delhi and 48.50% of consumers in Mumbai often make purchases influenced by social media.

Consumers were asked that have they ever stopped following a brand due to a negative impression of an influencer associated with it and as a result, in Mumbai maximum number of consumers (62.50%) said that yes they did so, while in Delhi majority of consumers (62.70%) said that negative impression of an influencer doesn’t affect their engagement with an influencer.

 

Table 4: Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers

Frequency

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Always

52

18.6

71

21.6

123

20.3

Often

141

50.5

159

48.5

300

49.4

Sometimes

74

26.5

85

25.9

159

26.2

Rarely

12

4.3

13

4.0

25

4.1

Never

0

0.0

0

0.0

0

0.0

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

Response

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Yes

104

37.3

205

62.5

309

50.9

No

175

62.7

123

37.5

298

49.1

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

 

To check the impact of usage of social media on purchases made due to social media influence following hypothesis has been taken:-

H01:There is no significant impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence

Ha1:There is a significant impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence

The chi-square test was used to evaluate this hypothesis, and table 5 displays the results. The null hypothesis is rejected since the chi-statistic value is significant at the 5% level of significance, indicating that social media usage significantly influences purchases made as a result of social media influence. Here, it can be concluded that social media influence causes a rise in purchases as a result of heavy usage.

Table 5: Impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence

Average Per day Use of social media

Purchase frequency due to social media influence

Chi - Statistic

p-value

Result

Always

Often

Sometimes

Rarely

Total

Less than 1 hour

6

13

9

5

33

195.357

0.000

Significant

1-2 hours

20

132

2

7

161

2-4 hours

125

89

3

8

225

More than 4 hours

74

60

48

6

188

Total

225

294

62

26

607

Level of Significance=5%

 

Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty

To gauge how social media influencers affected their brand loyalty, respondents were given a list of statements and asked to check the ones they agreed with. Table 6 is showing the agreement level of Gen Z consumers of Delhi. The respondents were strongly agreed with three statements which indicated that the authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand (Mean=4.39), they are more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers they trust (Mean=4.29) and an influencer's endorsement makes them more likely to try a brand (Mean=4.28). The respondents were agreed with all other statements. In the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Delhi; Influencers have a greater impact on their purchasing decisions than traditional advertising, influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves and their perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with. Overall Delhi consumers showed positive impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty

Table 6: Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Delhi Consumers

Statements

Mean

S.D.

C.V.

Level of Agreement

I often discover new brands through social media influencers.

3.49

1.05

0.30

Agree

I trust the product recommendations made by influencers I follow.

3.74

0.89

0.24

Agree

An influencer's endorsement makes me more likely to try a brand.

4.28

0.76

0.18

Strongly Agree

I feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers I admire.

3.67

1.04

0.28

Agree

The authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand.

4.39

0.99

0.23

Strongly Agree

I am more likely to purchase a product if I see it endorsed by an influencer I trust.

3.49

0.87

0.25

Agree

Influencers help me make informed purchasing decisions.

3.82

1.21

0.32

Agree

I follow influencers who represent brands that align with my values.

3.69

0.65

0.18

Agree

I actively seek out influencers who promote brands I love.

3.44

0.74

0.22

Agree

My perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with.

3.99

1.01

0.25

Agree

I am more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers I trust.

4.29

0.85

0.20

Strongly Agree

Influencers have a greater impact on my purchasing decisions than traditional advertising.

4.04

1.02

0.25

Agree

I feel that influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves.

4.01

1.21

0.30

Agree

 

The overall effect of social media influencers on Delhi consumers' brand loyalty is displayed in Table 7. While over 90% of customers (93.90%) stated that social media influencers have a strong impact on their brand loyalty, just 6.10% of consumers answered that social media influencers have a poor impact on brand loyalty.

Table 7: Overall Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Delhi Consumers

Overall Impact

N

Percentage

Low

17

6.1

High

262

93.9

Total

279

100

 

Table 8 is showing the agreement level of Gen Z consumers of Mumbai. The respondents were strongly agreed with two statements which indicated that they feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers they admire (Mean=4.49) and an influencer's endorsement makes them more likely to try a brand (Mean=4.21). The respondents were agreed with all other statements. In the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Mumbai they are more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers they trust, their perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with, and the authenticity of an influencer affects their loyalty to a brand. Overall Mumbai consumers showed positive impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty.

 

Table 8: Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Mumbai Consumers

Statements

Mean

S.D.

C.V.

Level of Agreement

I often discover new brands through social media influencers.

3.69

0.79

0.21

Agree

I trust the product recommendations made by influencers I follow.

3.89

0.85

0.22

Agree

An influencer's endorsement makes me more likely to try a brand.

4.21

0.56

0.13

Strongly Agree

I feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers I admire.

4.49

0.62

0.14

Strongly Agree

The authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand.

4.05

1.02

0.25

Agree

I am more likely to purchase a product if I see it endorsed by an influencer I trust.

3.79

0.65

0.17

Agree

Influencers help me make informed purchasing decisions.

3.64

0.79

0.22

Agree

I follow influencers who represent brands that align with my values.

3.45

0.88

0.26

Agree

I actively seek out influencers who promote brands I love.

3.86

0.91

0.24

Agree

My perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with.

4.09

1.05

0.26

Agree

I am more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers I trust.

4.12

0.63

0.15

Agree

Influencers have a greater impact on my purchasing decisions than traditional advertising.

3.54

0.74

0.21

Agree

I feel that influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves.

3.42

0.84

0.25

Agree

 

Table 9 is showing the overall impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Mumbai Consumers. Only 7% consumers indicated the low impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty otherwise more than 90% of the consumers (93%) said that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty.

 

Table 9: Overall Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Mumbai Consumers

Overall Impact

N

Percentage

Low

23

7.0

High

305

93.0

Total

328

100

 

To test the difference in impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai following hypothesis has been taken:-

H02:There is no significant difference in the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai

Ha2:There is a significant difference in the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai

Two sample t-tests were used to evaluate this hypothesis, and the results are shown in Table 10. The hypothesis is rejected since all the t-values are significant except one, indicating that the influence of social media influencers on the brand loyalty of Mumbai and Delhi's Gen Z consumers differs significantly.

Table 10:Difference in the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai

Statements

Delhi

Mumbai

t-value

P-value

Result

Mean

S.D.

Mean

S.D.

I often discover new brands through social media influencers.

3.49

1.05

3.69

0.79

2.592

0.009

Significant

I trust the product recommendations made by influencers I follow.

3.74

0.89

3.89

0.85

2.121

0.034

Significant

An influencer's endorsement makes me more likely to try a brand.

4.28

0.76

4.19

0.56

1.68

0.094

Significant

I feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers I admire.

3.67

1.04

4.49

0.62

11.993

0.000

Significant

The authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand.

4.39

0.99

4.05

1.02

4.148

0.000

Significant

I am more likely to purchase a product if I see it endorsed by an influencer I trust.

3.49

0.87

3.79

0.65

4.85

0.000

Significant

Influencers help me make informed purchasing decisions.

3.82

1.21

3.64

0.79

2.199

0.028

Significant

I follow influencers who represent brands that align with my values.

3.69

0.65

3.45

0.88

3.764

0.000

Significant

I actively seek out influencers who promote brands I love.

3.44

0.74

3.86

0.91

6.17

0.000

Significant

My perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with.

3.99

1.01

4.09

1.05

1.19

0.234

Not Significant

I am more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers I trust.

4.29

0.85

4.12

0.63

2.823

0.004

Significant

Influencers have a greater impact on my purchasing decisions than traditional advertising.

4.04

1.02

3.54

0.74

6.98

0.000

Significant

I feel that influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves.

4.01

1.21

3.42

0.84

7.05

0.000

Significant

Level of Significance=5%

Table 11 shows the overall impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z Consumers. As per results,93.40% of consumers said that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty.

Table 11: Overall Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z Consumers

Overall Impact

Delhi

Mumbai

Total

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

N

Percentage

Low

17

6.1

23

7.0

40

6.6

High

262

93.9

305

93.0

567

93.4

Total

279

100

328

100

607

100

 

Discussion

The results indicated that Instagram is the most popular social media platform among Gen Z consumers followed by Facebook and YouTube. On average Gen Z consumers spend 2 to 4 hours daily on social media. Around half of the Gen Z consumers said that they follow influencers weekly. Delhi consumers prefer fitness influencers whereas Mumbai consumers are more inclined towards fashion influencers. Approximately half of the Delhi (50.5%) and Mumbai (48.50%) consumers indicated that they often make purchases influenced by social media influencers and sometimes they stopped following a brand due to a negative impression of an influencer associated with it. It was found that there is a significant impact of social media usage on purchases made which means that high use of social media leads to increased purchases due to social media influence. The results highlighted that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty. A significant difference was observed in the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai. This discussion will relate the results to existing literature, highlighting consistencies and discrepancies while offering a deeper understanding of these dynamics.

  1. Platform Popularity and Time Spent on Social Media

The finding that Instagram is the most popular platform among Gen Z consumers, followed by Facebook and YouTube, aligns with previous research that identifies Instagram as a favoured platform for younger audiences due to its visually engaging content and influencer culture (Saini et al., 2021). The reported average daily usage of 2 to 4 hours reflects broader trends noted in the literature, where Gen Z consumers exhibit high engagement levels on social media platforms. This extended time spent online amplifies the potential for brands to leverage influencer marketing strategies, as consumers are more exposed to promotional content.

  1. Influencer Following Patterns and Niche Preferences

The result indicating that around half of Gen Z consumers follow influencers weekly corroborates findings by Sfenrianto,Yunital&Gunawan (2018), who emphasize the importance of regular interaction with influencers in fostering brand loyalty. The preference for specific types of influencers—fitness influencers in Delhi and fashion influencers in Mumbai—suggests that cultural and regional factors play a significant role in shaping consumer preferences. This finding supports the notion that the effectiveness of influencer marketing can vary based on audience demographics and cultural contexts (Rathjens et al., 2024).

  1. Influence on Purchases and Brand Perceptions

The statistic that around half of consumers in both cities make purchases influenced by social media reflects research showing that influencer endorsements can significantly sway consumer buying decisions(Zoubi, 2019). Moreover, the finding that negative impressions of influencers can lead to the abandonment of brands aligns with Santoso&Dewi (2018). This highlights the fragile nature of brand relationships in the influencer landscape, where a single misstep by an influencer can tarnish brand loyalty.

  1. Social Media Usage and Purchase Behavior

The significant impact of social media usage on purchase decisions reinforces the connection identified in existing literature between high social media engagement and increased consumer responsiveness to influencer marketing (Santoso&Dewi, 2018).This suggests that brands aiming to enhance their market presence should focus on platforms that engage their target demographics effectively. The results underline the importance of strategic content creation and engagement practices to convert online interactions into tangible sales.

  1. Impact on Brand Loyalty across Regions

Finally, the finding that social media influencers significantly impact brand loyalty, with notable differences between consumers in Delhi and Mumbai, emphasizes the need for localized marketing strategies. This aligns with previous research indicating that cultural nuances can significantly affect consumer behaviour and loyalty patterns (Saini et al., 2021). The differing preferences between the two cities could suggest that brands need to tailor their influencer partnerships and marketing strategies to resonate with the unique values and interests of consumers in different regions.

Conclusion

The results of this study add to the expanding corpus of research on how social media influencers affect Generation Z consumers' brand loyalty. By situating these results within the context of existing research, it becomes evident that social media platforms, regional preferences, and consumer engagement significantly influence purchasing behavior and brand relationships. These dynamics should be further investigated in future studies, especially in culturally varied settings. to refine influencer marketing strategies and enhance brand loyalty.

References:

  1. Abdullahi, H. M., &Otori, Y. A. (2020). Customer loyalty as mediator on the relationshipt between social media influencer and purchase intention: a proposed framework.  J. Manag. Soc. Sci. Peace Conflict Stud3(3).
  2. Ahmed, S., Ghaffar, A., Zaheer Zaidi, S. S., Islam, T., Khan, M. M., Islam, F., … Sheikh, A. A. (2024). Influencer-driven loyalty: Understanding the mediating role of customer brand engagement in the relationship between social media influencers and brand loyalty. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 34(2), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2024.2308285
  3. Ahmed, S., Islam, T., &Ghaffar, A. (2024). Shaping Brand Loyalty through Social Media Influencers: The Mediating Role of Follower Engagement and Social Attractiveness. SAGE Open14(2),https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241242928
  4. Selezneva, A. (2024). Influence of social media content on TikTok on consumer purchasing intention of beauty and cosmetic products.
  5. Aisyah, M. (2023). The impact of a regional brand ambassador and social media advertising on brand trust and brand loyalty of Lazada in Indonesia. International Journal of Data and Network Science7(4), 1929-1940. DOI: 5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.019
  6. Çelik, Z. (2022). The moderating role of influencer attractiveness in the effect of brand love, brand trust, brand awareness and brand image on brand loyalty. İstanbul TicaretÜniversitesiSosyalBilimlerDergisi21(43), 148-167.https://doi.org/10.46928/iticusbe.1050122
  7. Es-Safi, K. (2022). Examining the effects of social media influencers characteristics on brand equity and purchase intention.https://hdl.handle.net/11467/5765
  8. Jun, S.and Yi, J. (2020), "What makes followers loyal? The role of influencer interactivity in building influencer brand equity", Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 29 No. 6, pp. 803-814. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-02-2019-2280
  9. Markethub, (2016), Influencer marketing vs word-of-mouth marketing. Retrieved from https://www.markethub.io/influencer-marketing-vs-word-of-mouth-marketing/
  10. Mehrabi, A. (2014). The Effect of Social Media Marketing on Customers ’ Brand Loyalty. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(8), 480–495. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i8/1124
  11. Rathjens, B., Wu, A., Zhang, L., & Wei, W. (2024). When Social Media Influencer Endorsement Backfires: Unpacking Fallout From Explicit Endorsements Across Brand Equity Levels. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480231223150
  12. Saini, D., Sharma, M., Gupta, S., & Verma, H. (2021). Effect of social media influencers and celebrity endorsers on brand loyalty through brand image. Empirical Economics Letters20, 161-170.
  13. Santoso, R. K., & Dewi, N. F. (2018). The Influence of Social Media Against Customer Retention ( Case Study on J . Co ). In The 2nd International Conference on Vocational Higher Education (ICVHE) (Vol. 2018, pp. 1436–1472). https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.2860
  14. Sfenrianto, I., Yunital, R., &Gunawan, W. (2018). The influence of social media to loyalty in an e-commerce. In 2nd Nommensen International Conference on Technology and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/420/1/012102
  15. Zoubi, F. H. (2019). The Impact of Social Media on Customers ’ Loyalty toward Hotels in. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(5), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v14n5p123
  16. Valmohammadi, C., Asayesh, F., Mehdikhani, R., &Taraz, R. (2024). Influencer Marketing, EWOM, E-Brand Experience, and Retail E-Brand Loyalty: Moderating Influence of E-Brand Love. Journal of Relationship Marketing, 1-27.
  17. Djafarova, E., &Rushworth, C. (2017). Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009