The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Brand Loyalty among Gen Z Consumers: An Analytical and Comparative Study of Delhi and Mumbai
Sweta Saxena
Associate Professor,
Dean - Academic Affairs,
College of Management Studies, Kanpur
Dr. Evelina Brajesh Sahay
Bharati Vidyapeeth
(Deemed to be University),
Department of Management Studies,
Navi Mumbai
Dr. Manisha
Assistant Professor,
Department of commerce,
Delhi School of Economics,
University of Delhi
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5012-7857
Dr. A. Udaya Shankar
Associate Professor,
K L Business School,
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation,
A Deemed to be University,
Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India
Dr Manoj Kumar
Assistant Professor,
Amity University Rajasthan
ORCID-0000-0002-8894-529X
Abstract
The emergence of social media has completely changed the marketing landscape with social media influencers becoming increasingly potent in influencing consumer behaviour, especially among Generation Z (Gen Z), This study's main goal was to investigate how social media influencers affect Gen Z consumers' brand loyalty. Further, the research also compared the results for Delhi and Mumbai. The sample of the study consisted of 279 Gen Z consumers of Delhi and 328 Gen Z consumers of Mumbai, in total 607 respondents were included in the sample. The data was collected with the help of a structured questionnaire. The results revealed that Instagram is the most popular social media among Gen Z consumers and on average they spent 2 to 4 hours on various social media platforms. Consumers regularly follow influencers and often make purchases due to social media influence. The results highlighted that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty. A significant difference was observed in the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai.
Keywords: Social media influencer, Brand loyalty, Gen Z
Introduction:
In recent years, social media has transformed the landscape of marketing and consumer engagement, particularly among Generation Z (Gen Z), a demographic characterized by its digital nativity and distinct consumer behaviours, Social media influencers have become crucial players in influencing consumer choices and brand impressions as platforms like YouTube, Instagram, and TikTok continue to grow (Selezneva, 2024). This study examines how social media influencers affect brand loyalty, especially among Gen Z customers. —an increasingly important demographic characterized by their digital savviness and distinct consumer behaviours.
Born roughly between 1997 and 2012, Generation Z is a generation that grew up in a time when social media and technology were prevalent. One characteristic of this generation is its heavy reliance on social media for connection, entertainment, and information. Unlike previous generations, Gen Z consumers value authenticity, transparency, and relatability in their interactions with brands. Research highlights that Gen Z is more likely to trust influencers perceived as genuine rather than traditional advertising, driving higher levels of engagement and brand loyalty (Djafarova&Rushworth, 2017).As a result, the rise of social media influencers—individuals who leverage their online presence to promote products and services—has become a pivotal element in shaping brand loyalty among these consumers. Influencers often cultivate a sense of community and trust with their followers, which can significantly impact brand perceptions and purchasing decisions (Valmohammadi et al., 2024). This phenomenon raises critical questions about the dynamics of influence, the authenticity of endorsements, and the overall effectiveness of influencer marketing strategies in fostering long-term brand loyalty.
Through this study, we aim to explore the intricate relationship between social media influencers and Gen Z consumers, examining how influencers affect brand loyalty, the factors that contribute to this influence, and the implications for brands seeking to engage effectively with this unique demographic. By comprehending these characteristics Brands can create more appealing marketing tactics that appeal to Generation Z, ultimately enhancing brand loyalty and driving consumer engagement.
Review of Literature
The emergence of social media platforms has given rise to influencers who possess the ability to reach large audiences and engage them in meaningful ways. Influencers are often seen as relatable figures who embody the values and lifestyles that resonate with their followers (Abdullahi&Otori, 2020). Their perceived authenticity and personal connections with audiences differentiate them from traditional advertising methods (Ahmed et al., 2024).
A significant body of research highlights the importance of credibility and trust in influencer marketing. Studies suggest that consumers are more likely to develop brand loyalty when they perceive influencers as trustworthy and credible sources (Ahmed, Islam & Ghaffar, 2024). Influencer credibility is often derived from expertise, attractiveness, and reliability. When influencers share genuine experiences with a brand, they can foster emotional connections that enhance loyalty (Aisyah, 2023).
Social media influencers excel in creating engaged communities around their content. Engaged followers often feel a sense of belonging and loyalty not only to the influencer but also to the brands they endorse. Research indicates that high levels of engagement, such as likes, shares, and comments, positively correlate with consumer loyalty to the endorsed brands (Çelik, 2022). This sense of community is particularly relevant for Generation Z, who prioritize social interaction and peer validation in their purchasing decisions.
The alignment between influencer values and brand identity plays a crucial role in shaping brand loyalty. When influencers authentically embody the essence of a brand, they can reinforce brand image and resonate with consumers’ self-concepts (Es-Safi, 2022). Conversely, mismatches between influencer personas and brand messages can lead to consumer scepticism and diminished loyalty.
Content quality and authenticity are paramount in influencer marketing. Studies suggest that consumers respond more positively to organic, relatable content compared to polished advertisements (Jun and Yi, 2020). Authentic storytelling and transparency about brand partnerships can enhance consumer trust and loyalty. This is especially critical for Gen Z, who are adept at discerning authenticity in digital communications.
Cultural context and social dynamics also influence the effectiveness of influencer marketing. Influencers often act as cultural intermediaries, shaping consumer perceptions across different demographics and markets. Research indicates that influencers can bridge cultural gaps and promote inclusivity, which can further solidify brand loyalty among diverse consumer groups (Mehrabi, 2014).
Despite the benefits, challenges such as influencer fraud, saturation of the influencer market, and ethical concerns regarding transparency can undermine the efficacy of influencer marketing. Studies emphasize the need for ethical practices, including clear disclosure of paid partnerships, to maintain consumer trust and brand integrity (Markethub,, 2016).
The literature underscores that as brands continue to navigate the evolving digital landscape, understanding the dynamics of influencer marketing and its impact on consumer behaviour will be crucial for developing effective strategies that foster long-term loyalty. This helps in identifying the enduring effects of influencer partnerships and exploring the implications of emerging social media trends on brand loyalty.
Research gap
While much research has addressed influencer marketing broadly, there is a paucity of studies specifically targeting Generation Z. This demographic has unique characteristics, values, and behaviours that differentiate it from previous generations. Further research is needed to explore how these factors specifically influence their responses to social media influencers and, consequently, their brand loyalty. Research exploring how influencers impact brand loyalty among Gen Z consumers is limited.
Objectives
Hypotheses
Methodology
This paper is intended to check the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers so causal research design is used.
Sampling: The population frame included the Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai, so by using convenience sampling 279 consumers of Delhi and 328 consumers of Mumbai were included in the present study.
Data Collection: Data was collected by using a close-ended questionnaire which was divided into 5 sections i.e. (a) demographic profile (b) social media usage (c) influencer engagement (d) brand interaction (e) impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty.
Statistical Analysis: The data has been analyzed in SPSS 21.0. For interpretation percentage analysis, a two-sample t-test and chi-square test were used.
Results
Demographic Profile
In the beginning of questionnaire Gen Z Consumers were asked to indicate their demographic profile as shown Table 1
Table 1: Demographic Profile of Gen Z Consumers
Gender |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Male |
146 |
52.3 |
202 |
61.6 |
348 |
57.3 |
Female |
133 |
47.7 |
126 |
38.4 |
259 |
42.7 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Age Group |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
20 to 23 Years |
121 |
43.4 |
147 |
44.8 |
268 |
44.2 |
24 to 27 Years |
158 |
56.6 |
181 |
55.2 |
339 |
55.8 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Occupation Status |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Student |
101 |
36.2 |
87 |
26.5 |
188 |
31.0 |
Unemployed |
74 |
26.5 |
117 |
35.7 |
191 |
31.5 |
Employed |
104 |
37.3 |
124 |
37.8 |
228 |
37.5 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Social Media Usage of Gen Z Consumers
As per the data shown in Table 2, all Gen Z consumers used Instagram. The next three popular social media platforms after Instagram were Facebook (91.10%), YouTube (89.30%) and Twitter (83.70%). If we compare the percentages of the two sample cities, then it can be concluded that Gen Z consumers of Mumbai were more active on social media platforms as compared to the Gen Z consumers of Delhi.
Further respondents were asked to indicate the average time spent by them on social media platforms and it was found that the majority of consumers are spending 2 to 4 hours on social media (37.10%) followed by more than 4 hours (31%) and 1 to 2 hours (26.50%).
Table 2: Social Media Usage of Gen Z Consumers
Social Media Platform |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
|
279 |
100.0 |
328 |
100.0 |
607 |
100.0 |
YouTube |
241 |
86.4 |
301 |
91.8 |
542 |
89.3 |
|
232 |
83.2 |
276 |
84.1 |
508 |
83.7 |
|
248 |
88.9 |
305 |
93.0 |
553 |
91.1 |
Average Per day Use |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Less than 1 hour |
11 |
3.9 |
22 |
6.7 |
33 |
5.4 |
1-2 hours |
87 |
31.2 |
74 |
22.6 |
161 |
26.5 |
2-4 hours |
124 |
44.4 |
101 |
30.8 |
225 |
37.1 |
More than 4 hours |
57 |
20.4 |
131 |
39.9 |
188 |
31.0 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers
Gen Z consumers were asked how frequently they follow influencers and as a response majority of consumers of Delhi (47.30%) and Mumbai (49.40%) said that they follow influencers on weekly basis. A significant number of consumers (Delhi=36.20%, Mumbai=37.10%) highlighted the daily following of influencers.
When asked about the type of influences followed, the majority of respondents (71.30%) said that they follow fitness influencers followed by fashion influencers (70.20%) and travel influencers (63.10%). It could be observed that a maximum number of Delhi consumers (72%) follow fitness influencers whereas the maximum number of Mumbai consumers (75.30%) follow fashion influencers.
The popularity of influencers keeps on changing and new influencers also emerge in market so consumers were asked that how do they usually discover new influencers. As a result it was observed that majority of Delhi (76.30%) and Mumbai consumers (90.90%) follow new influencers due to social media algorithms. Overall 64.30% consumers said that they follow new influencers based on the recommendation received from friends
Table 3: Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers
Frequency of following influencer |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Daily |
101 |
36.2 |
124 |
37.8 |
225 |
37.1 |
Weekly |
132 |
47.3 |
162 |
49.4 |
294 |
48.4 |
Monthly |
25 |
9.0 |
37 |
11.3 |
62 |
10.2 |
Rarely |
21 |
7.5 |
5 |
1.5 |
26 |
4.3 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Type of Influencer |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Fashion |
179 |
64.2 |
247 |
75.3 |
426 |
70.2 |
Beauty |
154 |
55.2 |
201 |
61.3 |
355 |
58.5 |
Fitness |
201 |
72.0 |
232 |
70.7 |
433 |
71.3 |
Gaming |
101 |
36.2 |
147 |
44.8 |
248 |
40.9 |
Travel |
124 |
44.4 |
259 |
79.0 |
383 |
63.1 |
Food |
154 |
55.2 |
200 |
61.0 |
354 |
58.3 |
Source |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Recommendations from friends |
148 |
53.0 |
242 |
73.8 |
390 |
64.3 |
Social media algorithms |
213 |
76.3 |
298 |
90.9 |
511 |
84.2 |
Sponsored ads |
101 |
36.2 |
154 |
47.0 |
255 |
42.0 |
Other |
42 |
15.1 |
51 |
15.5 |
93 |
15.3 |
Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers
Gen Z consumers were asked how often they make purchases influenced by social media and as a response, it was found that approximately half of the consumers (49.40%) often make purchases influenced by social media. 20.3% of consumers indicated that they always make purchases influenced by social media whereas 26.20% of consumers said that they sometimes make purchases influenced by social media. Individually 50.50% of consumers in Delhi and 48.50% of consumers in Mumbai often make purchases influenced by social media.
Consumers were asked that have they ever stopped following a brand due to a negative impression of an influencer associated with it and as a result, in Mumbai maximum number of consumers (62.50%) said that yes they did so, while in Delhi majority of consumers (62.70%) said that negative impression of an influencer doesn’t affect their engagement with an influencer.
Table 4: Influencer Engagement of Gen Z Consumers
Frequency |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Always |
52 |
18.6 |
71 |
21.6 |
123 |
20.3 |
Often |
141 |
50.5 |
159 |
48.5 |
300 |
49.4 |
Sometimes |
74 |
26.5 |
85 |
25.9 |
159 |
26.2 |
Rarely |
12 |
4.3 |
13 |
4.0 |
25 |
4.1 |
Never |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Response |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Yes |
104 |
37.3 |
205 |
62.5 |
309 |
50.9 |
No |
175 |
62.7 |
123 |
37.5 |
298 |
49.1 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
To check the impact of usage of social media on purchases made due to social media influence following hypothesis has been taken:-
H01:There is no significant impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence
Ha1:There is a significant impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence
The chi-square test was used to evaluate this hypothesis, and table 5 displays the results. The null hypothesis is rejected since the chi-statistic value is significant at the 5% level of significance, indicating that social media usage significantly influences purchases made as a result of social media influence. Here, it can be concluded that social media influence causes a rise in purchases as a result of heavy usage.
Table 5: Impact of social media usage on purchases made due to social media influence
Average Per day Use of social media |
Purchase frequency due to social media influence |
Chi - Statistic |
p-value |
Result |
||||
Always |
Often |
Sometimes |
Rarely |
Total |
||||
Less than 1 hour |
6 |
13 |
9 |
5 |
33 |
195.357 |
0.000 |
Significant |
1-2 hours |
20 |
132 |
2 |
7 |
161 |
|||
2-4 hours |
125 |
89 |
3 |
8 |
225 |
|||
More than 4 hours |
74 |
60 |
48 |
6 |
188 |
|||
Total |
225 |
294 |
62 |
26 |
607 |
Level of Significance=5%
Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty
To gauge how social media influencers affected their brand loyalty, respondents were given a list of statements and asked to check the ones they agreed with. Table 6 is showing the agreement level of Gen Z consumers of Delhi. The respondents were strongly agreed with three statements which indicated that the authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand (Mean=4.39), they are more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers they trust (Mean=4.29) and an influencer's endorsement makes them more likely to try a brand (Mean=4.28). The respondents were agreed with all other statements. In the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Delhi; Influencers have a greater impact on their purchasing decisions than traditional advertising, influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves and their perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with. Overall Delhi consumers showed positive impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty
Table 6: Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Delhi Consumers
Statements |
Mean |
S.D. |
C.V. |
Level of Agreement |
I often discover new brands through social media influencers. |
3.49 |
1.05 |
0.30 |
Agree |
I trust the product recommendations made by influencers I follow. |
3.74 |
0.89 |
0.24 |
Agree |
An influencer's endorsement makes me more likely to try a brand. |
4.28 |
0.76 |
0.18 |
Strongly Agree |
I feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers I admire. |
3.67 |
1.04 |
0.28 |
Agree |
The authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand. |
4.39 |
0.99 |
0.23 |
Strongly Agree |
I am more likely to purchase a product if I see it endorsed by an influencer I trust. |
3.49 |
0.87 |
0.25 |
Agree |
Influencers help me make informed purchasing decisions. |
3.82 |
1.21 |
0.32 |
Agree |
I follow influencers who represent brands that align with my values. |
3.69 |
0.65 |
0.18 |
Agree |
I actively seek out influencers who promote brands I love. |
3.44 |
0.74 |
0.22 |
Agree |
My perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with. |
3.99 |
1.01 |
0.25 |
Agree |
I am more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers I trust. |
4.29 |
0.85 |
0.20 |
Strongly Agree |
Influencers have a greater impact on my purchasing decisions than traditional advertising. |
4.04 |
1.02 |
0.25 |
Agree |
I feel that influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves. |
4.01 |
1.21 |
0.30 |
Agree |
The overall effect of social media influencers on Delhi consumers' brand loyalty is displayed in Table 7. While over 90% of customers (93.90%) stated that social media influencers have a strong impact on their brand loyalty, just 6.10% of consumers answered that social media influencers have a poor impact on brand loyalty.
Table 7: Overall Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Delhi Consumers
Overall Impact |
N |
Percentage |
Low |
17 |
6.1 |
High |
262 |
93.9 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
Table 8 is showing the agreement level of Gen Z consumers of Mumbai. The respondents were strongly agreed with two statements which indicated that they feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers they admire (Mean=4.49) and an influencer's endorsement makes them more likely to try a brand (Mean=4.21). The respondents were agreed with all other statements. In the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Mumbai they are more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers they trust, their perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with, and the authenticity of an influencer affects their loyalty to a brand. Overall Mumbai consumers showed positive impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty.
Table 8: Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Mumbai Consumers
Statements |
Mean |
S.D. |
C.V. |
Level of Agreement |
I often discover new brands through social media influencers. |
3.69 |
0.79 |
0.21 |
Agree |
I trust the product recommendations made by influencers I follow. |
3.89 |
0.85 |
0.22 |
Agree |
An influencer's endorsement makes me more likely to try a brand. |
4.21 |
0.56 |
0.13 |
Strongly Agree |
I feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers I admire. |
4.49 |
0.62 |
0.14 |
Strongly Agree |
The authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand. |
4.05 |
1.02 |
0.25 |
Agree |
I am more likely to purchase a product if I see it endorsed by an influencer I trust. |
3.79 |
0.65 |
0.17 |
Agree |
Influencers help me make informed purchasing decisions. |
3.64 |
0.79 |
0.22 |
Agree |
I follow influencers who represent brands that align with my values. |
3.45 |
0.88 |
0.26 |
Agree |
I actively seek out influencers who promote brands I love. |
3.86 |
0.91 |
0.24 |
Agree |
My perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with. |
4.09 |
1.05 |
0.26 |
Agree |
I am more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers I trust. |
4.12 |
0.63 |
0.15 |
Agree |
Influencers have a greater impact on my purchasing decisions than traditional advertising. |
3.54 |
0.74 |
0.21 |
Agree |
I feel that influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves. |
3.42 |
0.84 |
0.25 |
Agree |
Table 9 is showing the overall impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Mumbai Consumers. Only 7% consumers indicated the low impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty otherwise more than 90% of the consumers (93%) said that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty.
Table 9: Overall Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Mumbai Consumers
Overall Impact |
N |
Percentage |
Low |
23 |
7.0 |
High |
305 |
93.0 |
Total |
328 |
100 |
To test the difference in impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai following hypothesis has been taken:-
H02:There is no significant difference in the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai
Ha2:There is a significant difference in the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai
Two sample t-tests were used to evaluate this hypothesis, and the results are shown in Table 10. The hypothesis is rejected since all the t-values are significant except one, indicating that the influence of social media influencers on the brand loyalty of Mumbai and Delhi's Gen Z consumers differs significantly.
Table 10:Difference in the impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai
Statements |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
t-value |
P-value |
Result |
||
Mean |
S.D. |
Mean |
S.D. |
||||
I often discover new brands through social media influencers. |
3.49 |
1.05 |
3.69 |
0.79 |
2.592 |
0.009 |
Significant |
I trust the product recommendations made by influencers I follow. |
3.74 |
0.89 |
3.89 |
0.85 |
2.121 |
0.034 |
Significant |
An influencer's endorsement makes me more likely to try a brand. |
4.28 |
0.76 |
4.19 |
0.56 |
1.68 |
0.094 |
Significant |
I feel a personal connection to brands promoted by influencers I admire. |
3.67 |
1.04 |
4.49 |
0.62 |
11.993 |
0.000 |
Significant |
The authenticity of an influencer affects my loyalty to a brand. |
4.39 |
0.99 |
4.05 |
1.02 |
4.148 |
0.000 |
Significant |
I am more likely to purchase a product if I see it endorsed by an influencer I trust. |
3.49 |
0.87 |
3.79 |
0.65 |
4.85 |
0.000 |
Significant |
Influencers help me make informed purchasing decisions. |
3.82 |
1.21 |
3.64 |
0.79 |
2.199 |
0.028 |
Significant |
I follow influencers who represent brands that align with my values. |
3.69 |
0.65 |
3.45 |
0.88 |
3.764 |
0.000 |
Significant |
I actively seek out influencers who promote brands I love. |
3.44 |
0.74 |
3.86 |
0.91 |
6.17 |
0.000 |
Significant |
My perception of a brand changes based on the influencers they partner with. |
3.99 |
1.01 |
4.09 |
1.05 |
1.19 |
0.234 |
Not Significant |
I am more likely to remain loyal to a brand if it consistently collaborates with influencers I trust. |
4.29 |
0.85 |
4.12 |
0.63 |
2.823 |
0.004 |
Significant |
Influencers have a greater impact on my purchasing decisions than traditional advertising. |
4.04 |
1.02 |
3.54 |
0.74 |
6.98 |
0.000 |
Significant |
I feel that influencers provide a more relatable perspective on products than brands themselves. |
4.01 |
1.21 |
3.42 |
0.84 |
7.05 |
0.000 |
Significant |
Level of Significance=5%
Table 11 shows the overall impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z Consumers. As per results,93.40% of consumers said that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty.
Table 11: Overall Impact of social media influencers on brand loyalty of Gen Z Consumers
Overall Impact |
Delhi |
Mumbai |
Total |
|||
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
N |
Percentage |
|
Low |
17 |
6.1 |
23 |
7.0 |
40 |
6.6 |
High |
262 |
93.9 |
305 |
93.0 |
567 |
93.4 |
Total |
279 |
100 |
328 |
100 |
607 |
100 |
Discussion
The results indicated that Instagram is the most popular social media platform among Gen Z consumers followed by Facebook and YouTube. On average Gen Z consumers spend 2 to 4 hours daily on social media. Around half of the Gen Z consumers said that they follow influencers weekly. Delhi consumers prefer fitness influencers whereas Mumbai consumers are more inclined towards fashion influencers. Approximately half of the Delhi (50.5%) and Mumbai (48.50%) consumers indicated that they often make purchases influenced by social media influencers and sometimes they stopped following a brand due to a negative impression of an influencer associated with it. It was found that there is a significant impact of social media usage on purchases made which means that high use of social media leads to increased purchases due to social media influence. The results highlighted that there is a high impact of social media influencers on their brand loyalty. A significant difference was observed in the opinion of Gen Z consumers of Delhi and Mumbai. This discussion will relate the results to existing literature, highlighting consistencies and discrepancies while offering a deeper understanding of these dynamics.
The finding that Instagram is the most popular platform among Gen Z consumers, followed by Facebook and YouTube, aligns with previous research that identifies Instagram as a favoured platform for younger audiences due to its visually engaging content and influencer culture (Saini et al., 2021). The reported average daily usage of 2 to 4 hours reflects broader trends noted in the literature, where Gen Z consumers exhibit high engagement levels on social media platforms. This extended time spent online amplifies the potential for brands to leverage influencer marketing strategies, as consumers are more exposed to promotional content.
The result indicating that around half of Gen Z consumers follow influencers weekly corroborates findings by Sfenrianto,Yunital&Gunawan (2018), who emphasize the importance of regular interaction with influencers in fostering brand loyalty. The preference for specific types of influencers—fitness influencers in Delhi and fashion influencers in Mumbai—suggests that cultural and regional factors play a significant role in shaping consumer preferences. This finding supports the notion that the effectiveness of influencer marketing can vary based on audience demographics and cultural contexts (Rathjens et al., 2024).
The statistic that around half of consumers in both cities make purchases influenced by social media reflects research showing that influencer endorsements can significantly sway consumer buying decisions(Zoubi, 2019). Moreover, the finding that negative impressions of influencers can lead to the abandonment of brands aligns with Santoso&Dewi (2018). This highlights the fragile nature of brand relationships in the influencer landscape, where a single misstep by an influencer can tarnish brand loyalty.
The significant impact of social media usage on purchase decisions reinforces the connection identified in existing literature between high social media engagement and increased consumer responsiveness to influencer marketing (Santoso&Dewi, 2018).This suggests that brands aiming to enhance their market presence should focus on platforms that engage their target demographics effectively. The results underline the importance of strategic content creation and engagement practices to convert online interactions into tangible sales.
Finally, the finding that social media influencers significantly impact brand loyalty, with notable differences between consumers in Delhi and Mumbai, emphasizes the need for localized marketing strategies. This aligns with previous research indicating that cultural nuances can significantly affect consumer behaviour and loyalty patterns (Saini et al., 2021). The differing preferences between the two cities could suggest that brands need to tailor their influencer partnerships and marketing strategies to resonate with the unique values and interests of consumers in different regions.
Conclusion
The results of this study add to the expanding corpus of research on how social media influencers affect Generation Z consumers' brand loyalty. By situating these results within the context of existing research, it becomes evident that social media platforms, regional preferences, and consumer engagement significantly influence purchasing behavior and brand relationships. These dynamics should be further investigated in future studies, especially in culturally varied settings. to refine influencer marketing strategies and enhance brand loyalty.
References: