AI-Driven Branding Applications for New Age Management Institutions: An Empirical Exploration
DM Arvind Mallik
Postdoctoral Researcher
Lincoln University College, Malaysia.
Prof Dr Amiya Bhaumik
President & Supervisor,
Lincoln University College, Malaysia
Prof. Dr. Parin Somani
Co-Founder, Co-CEO & Co-Supervisor (External)
London Organisation of Skills Development
Abstract
The incorporation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into branding strategies is transforming management education as institutions strive to stay competitive in a rapidly changing market. This study explored MBA students' attitudes toward AI-powered branding strategies at 10 autonomous institutions in Bengaluru, surveying 390 students on their awareness and perceptions of AI integration. Statistical analysis revealed a moderate correlation between students' awareness of AI applications and their willingness to adopt these strategies. While students recognized AI's potential to enhance personalization, customer engagement, and operational efficiency, they also expressed skepticism about its necessity and raised concerns about ethical implications and limited exposure to AI technologies. These findings highlight the need for educational institutions to better integrate AI into their curricula, preparing future managers to thrive in a technology-driven business landscape. The research emphasizes the importance of aligning educational programs with marketplace demands and contributes valuable insights into the role of AI in branding within management education. Ultimately, by addressing the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, institutions can enhance their competitive edge and ensure that graduates are equipped to navigate the complexities of modern branding strategies.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence (AI), Branding Strategies, Management Education, Student Perceptions, Curriculum Reform.
AI integration in higher education is reshaping branding strategies as institutions strive for distinctiveness in a competitive landscape (Makosa, 2024; Saaida, 2023). By analyzing data on student preferences, institutions can create tailored marketing strategies that enhance engagement and value propositions (Hong & Hardy, 2022; Venkateswaran et al., 2024). AI tools like chatbots and predictive analytics improve operational efficiency and brand narratives (Sheth et al., 2022; Stone et al., 2020). However, challenges such as resistance to change and data privacy concerns hinder broader adoption (Mandal, 2022; Cantú-Ortiz et al., 2020). Despite these issues, AI continues to influence branding strategies and institutional effectiveness (Forman et al., 2023; Mallik & Aithal, 2024).
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Business
AI replicates human behaviour, enhancing efficiency through automation and data-driven decision-making (Toorajipour et al., 2021; Chintalapati & Pandey, 2022). It drives industrial advancements with its learning and reasoning capabilities (Soni, 2020; Kaplan, 2021). By analyzing user data, AI enables market forecasting (Elhajjar et al., 2021) and optimizes marketing through personalized recommendations (Schiessl et al., 2021). AI enhances marketing efficiency through automation, scalability, and cost-effectiveness (Wierenga, 2010), while technologies like NLP and deep learning create new commercial opportunities (Maedche et al., 2019; Sterne, 2017). Additionally, AI-driven analytics improve decision-making (Tarafdar et al., 2019) and predict customer needs (Clarke, 2019). Tools such as chatbots enhance operational efficiency (Campbell et al., 2020), and personalized strategies increase customer engagement (Machireddy et al., 2021; Burström et al., 2021).
Need for AI In Marketing and Branding
AI enhances marketing by understanding customer needs, linking products, and driving sales (Capatina et al., 2020). Machine learning (ML) analyzes data for resource allocation (Frank, 2021) and improves customer experiences (P. Khokhar, 2019). It optimizes ROI through data-driven personalization and strategy refinement (Peyravi & Nekrošienė, 2020; Theodoridis & Gkikas, 2019), making AI integration vital for competitiveness (Zykun et al., 2020). A brand reflects customer perceptions shaped by interactions and consistency (Aaker, 2009; Keller, 2019). Social media amplifies these perceptions, while AI enhances personalization, satisfaction, and loyalty (West et al., 2018). It optimizes marketing, automates tasks, and improves customer experiences (Sabbar & Nygren Gustafsson, 2021; Musaiqer & Hamdan, 2023). AI tools like chatbots and predictive analytics enable real-time engagement and adaptability (Viswanath Reddy et al., 2023; Chourasia, 2024). Consequently, AI's role in branding is set to expand further in the coming years.
Branding in Higher Education
In higher education, management schools face challenges in maintaining brand identity amid digital competition (Garipağaoğlu, 2016). Institutions must balance narratives across platforms while adapting to evolving student preferences (Black, 2008; Gade, 2014). Digital transformation strategies that leverage AI and data analytics are crucial for enhancing branding efforts (Väliverronen, E.et al., 2022). Research indicates that institutions using these technologies gain a modest edge in attracting students and bringing personalized experiences (Curtis et al., 2009). By adopting innovative branding strategies, management schools can navigate these challenges and position themselves as forward-thinking, tech-savvy leaders in the educational sector (Abdullah et al., 2014).
Need for AI in Branding Management Institutions
Artificial Intelligence (AI) enhances MBA program branding by improving efficiency, engagement, and differentiation (Rajendran, 2021). It facilitates data-driven, personalized communication strategies, boosting conversion rates and brand image (Popescu, 2012; Буднікевич & Бастраков, 2024). Predictive analytics forecasts enrollment trends and evaluates marketing effectiveness (Kuleto et al., 2021). AI-powered chatbots provide 24/7 support, enhancing student experiences (Antonova, 2023). Additionally, AI helps businesses understand customer needs and deliver personalized experiences through sentiment analysis (Agersborg et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2019; West et al., 2018) and tailored content generation (Cheng & Jiang, 2022; Raitaluoto, 2023). By ensuring brand consistency across digital channels, AI attracts students seeking innovative experiences (Sankar, 2024; Spanos, 2021).Table No. 1 shows how AI can enhance branding efforts by streamlining operations, improving efficiency, and enhancing experiences across various departments, contributing to a cohesive and strong institutional brand.
Table No-1 Table showcases how AI can be used in branding across various departments in an MBA institution, with a focus on areas relevant to each department:
|
Department |
AI Area |
References
|
|
Marketing Dept |
Predictive Analytics & ML |
Arora, S., & Thota, S. R. (2024) |
|
Sentiment Analysis |
Adiguna, M. A., & Kom, M. (2023) |
|
|
AI-Enhanced CRM |
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023) |
|
|
Email Marketing Optimization |
Karwal, S. (2015) |
|
|
Augmented and Virtual Reality (AR, VR) Experiences |
Ashtari, N., Bunt, A., McGrenere, J., Nebeling, M., & Chilana, P. K. (2020, April) |
|
|
Personalized Customer Journey Mapping |
Gao, Y., & Liu, H. (2023) and V. Devang, S. Chintan, T. Gunjan, R. Krupa (2019) |
|
|
Generative AI |
Brockmann, H., & Wilhelm, A. (2022) |
|
|
Finance Dept |
AI-Driven Financial Analytics |
Oyeniyi, L. D., Ugochukwu, C. E., & Mhlongo, N. Z. (2024) and Oyeniyi, L. D., Ugochukwu, C. E., & Mhlongo, N. Z. (2024) |
|
Fraud Detection Systems |
Mohanty, B., & Mishra, S. (2023) |
|
|
HR Dept |
AI in Talent Acquisition |
Baratelli, G., & Colleoni, E. (2022) |
|
Employee Sentiment Analysis |
Arief, N. N., & Pangestu, A. B. (2022) |
|
|
Housekeeping Dept |
AI in Facilities Management |
Kärnä, S., & Julin, P. (2015) |
|
Transportation Dept |
AI for Fleet Management |
Tahir, M. A. (2024) |
|
Route Optimization |
Hubert, A. (2014) |
|
|
Library Dept |
AI in Knowledge Management |
Oprea, M. (2011) |
|
Personalized Content Recommendation |
Hidayat, A. F., Suwawi, D. D. J., & Laksitowening, K. A. (2020, June). |
|
|
Administrative Dept |
AI in Decision-Making |
Stone, M., Aravopoulou, E., Ekinci, Y., Evans, G., Hobbs, M., Labib, A., & Machtynger, L. (2020) |
|
Machine Learning (ML) |
Shoaib, M., Sayed, N., Singh, J., Shafi, J., Khan, S., & Ali, F. (2024) |
|
|
AI-Driven Performance Monitoring |
PEIRIS, M. S. (2022) |
|
|
Recommendation Systems |
Pazzani, M. J., & Billsus, D. (2007) |
|
|
Admissions Dept |
AI in Predictive Enrolment |
Hannan, E., & Liu, S. (2023) |
|
Chatbots & Virtual Assistants |
Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., Atwell, E., Bowman, H., Pickard, T., & Walker, A. (2022) |
|
|
Social Media Dept |
AI-Driven Content Creation |
Nasser, B. S. A., & Abu-Naser, S. S. (2024) |
|
Natural Language Processing (NLP) |
Vinutha, M. S., & Padma, M. C. (2023) |
|
|
AI-Based Social Listening |
Hayes, J. L., Britt, B. C., Evans, W., Rush, S. W., Towery, N. A., & Adamson, A. C. (2021) |
|
|
Programmatic Advertising |
Mallik, D. A. |
|
|
Image Recognition |
Shin, D., He, S., Lee, G. M., Whinston, A. B., Cetintas, S., & Lee, K. C. (2020) |
|
|
Social Media Monitoring |
Stavrakantonakis, I., Gagiu, A. E., Kasper, H., Toma, I., & Thalhammer, A. (2012) |
|
|
AI-Based Video Editing |
Soe, T. H., & Slavkovik, M. (2021) |
|
|
Virtual Brand Ambassadors |
Ewer, M., Veale, R., & Quester, P. (2015) |
|
|
Student Services Dept |
AI-Powered Chatbots |
Yeti̇şensoy, O., & Karaduman, H. (2024) |
|
IT Dept |
AI in Cybersecurity |
Binhammad, M., Alqaydi, S., Othman, A., & Abuljadayel, L. H. (2024) |
|
Network Optimization |
Fathian, M., Saei-Shahi, M., & Makui, A. (2017) |
|
|
Career Services Dept |
AI-Powered Career Counseling |
Bagai, R., & Mane, V. (2024) |
|
Events & PR Dept |
AI in Event Planning |
Liudmyla, B. A., Mouloudj, K., Rasulova, A. M., & Tkachuk, T. M. (2024) |
|
Academic Dept |
AI in Curriculum Development |
Serban, C., & Vescan, A. (2019) |
AI Integration from Management Institutions' Perspective: Research Gap
Despite the benefits of AI in branding, a significant research gap exists regarding its application in management institutions. Current literature emphasizes theoretical advantages over empirical insights into how these institutions perceive and implement AI strategies. Understanding student awareness of AI technologies is crucial for creating educational experiences that align with industry needs. Future research should focus on the strategic perspectives of management institutions on AI integration to better prepare students for the evolving workforce.
Data Analysis
The study used a descriptive research design across 10 PGDM MBA institutions in Bengaluru, surveying 390 students (56.41% male, 33.33% in Marketing, the recommended sample size was 381, with 410 questionnaires distributed and 390 received which were completed.). With a 5% margin of error and 95% confidence level, data was collected via structured questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS, ensuring ethical integrity.
Understanding various segments where AI can be integrated as branding strategies into management education
Table No-2: AI Applications in Branding, Marketing, and Engagement with Chi-Square Test Analysis
|
Aspect |
Very Useful |
Useful |
Neutral |
Not Useful |
Mean |
SD |
Observed Frequencies |
Expected Frequencies |
(O - E)²/E |
|
Career Services Enhancement |
40 |
95 |
130 |
125 |
2.78 |
0.76 |
500 |
500 |
0.00 |
|
Brand Awareness |
35 |
90 |
130 |
135 |
2.73 |
0.68 |
|||
|
Research Assistance |
35 |
85 |
140 |
130 |
2.73 |
0.73 |
|||
|
Alumni Engagement |
30 |
90 |
125 |
145 |
2.53 |
0.67 |
|||
|
Social Media Marketing |
30 |
85 |
110 |
165 |
2.41 |
0.82 |
|||
|
Predictive Analytics for Recruitment |
30 |
85 |
110 |
165 |
2.38 |
0.79 |
|||
|
Institutional Branding |
25 |
85 |
110 |
170 |
2.28 |
0.77 |
|||
|
Customer Experience |
25 |
90 |
120 |
155 |
2.20 |
0.73 |
|||
|
Content Creation |
30 |
85 |
120 |
155 |
2.10 |
0.71 |
|||
|
Online/Hybrid Programs |
20 |
70 |
120 |
180 |
2.08 |
0.83 |
|||
|
Data-Driven Branding Decisions |
20 |
75 |
110 |
185 |
1.85 |
0.84 |
|||
|
Engagement Metrics |
25 |
70 |
110 |
185 |
2.05 |
0.79 |
|||
|
Competitor Analysis |
20 |
75 |
120 |
175 |
2.03 |
0.75 |
|||
|
Brand Differentiation |
25 |
80 |
110 |
175 |
2.01 |
0.71 |
|||
|
Reputation Management |
20 |
80 |
90 |
200 |
1.90 |
0.83 |
|||
|
Industry Collaborations |
25 |
80 |
90 |
195 |
1.85 |
0.84 |
|||
|
Targeted Advertising |
25 |
80 |
90 |
195 |
1.83 |
0.83 |
|||
|
Student Enrollment and Retention |
20 |
75 |
100 |
195 |
1.81 |
0.80 |
|||
|
Brand Monitoring |
20 |
70 |
100 |
200 |
1.80 |
0.84 |
|||
|
Student Engagement Monitoring |
20 |
65 |
100 |
205 |
1.70 |
0.80 |
|||
|
SEO Optimization |
15 |
60 |
110 |
205 |
1.65 |
0.86 |
|||
|
Personalized Communication |
20 |
70 |
90 |
210 |
1.60 |
0.83 |
|||
|
Market Research Enhancement |
20 |
65 |
90 |
215 |
1.55 |
0.82 |
Chi-Square Test Analysis
Interpretation:
The combined data reveals that the perceived usefulness of various AI applications in branding, marketing, and engagement among respondents shows a generally low mean score, particularly in areas such as Data-Driven Branding Decisions and Market Research Enhancement. The Chi-Square test indicates no significant association between AI applications in career services and their perceived usefulness, as evidenced by a Chi-Square statistic of 0.00, which is less than the critical value of 7.815. This suggests that respondents' perceptions of AI applications in these areas do not significantly differ, and the overall utility of AI in these applications may require further exploration or enhancement to be deemed more beneficial.
Hypothesis
|
Hypothesis |
Statistical Test |
Observed Frequencies (O) |
Expected Frequencies (E) |
Chi-Square Value |
Degrees of Freedom |
P-value |
|
Hypothesis 1: AI will revolutionize brand personalization. |
Chi-Square Test of Independence |
Strongly Agree: 50 |
Strongly Agree: 78 |
73.56 |
4 |
< 0.001 (significant) |
|
Hypothesis 1: The significant chi-square value (73.56, p < 0.001) indicates that while many students believe AI will revolutionize brand personalization, a notable portion remains neutral or disagrees. This suggests mixed perceptions, with some students uncertain about AI's effectiveness in enhancing brand personalization.
|
||||||
|
Hypothesis 2: AI tools will enhance customer loyalty. |
Chi-Square Test of Independence |
Strongly Agree: 45 |
Strongly Agree: 78 |
43.46 |
4 |
< 0.001 (significant) |
|
Hypothesis 2: The analysis shows a significant association (Chi-Square Value: 43.46, p < 0.001) between student beliefs and the idea that AI tools will enhance customer loyalty. Although a majority agree, the presence of neutral and disagreeing responses reflects a cautious attitude, indicating that students recognize AI's potential but may have concerns about its practical effectiveness in fostering loyalty. |
||||||
|
Hypothesis 3: AI will become indispensable for global brands. |
Chi-Square Test of Independence |
Strongly Agree: 50 |
Strongly Agree: 78 |
62.24 |
4 |
< 0.001 (significant) |
|
Hypothesis 3: The strong association found (Chi-Square Value: 62.24, p < 0.001) regarding AI's indispensability for global brands suggests that while students acknowledge the increasing importance of AI, there is scepticism about its complete dominance in traditional branding contexts. Many students see AI as valuable but remain uncertain about its necessity across all sectors. |
||||||
Across all three hypotheses, Chi-square tests showed significant relationships, indicating students recognize AI's potential in branding and customer loyalty. However, mixed responses reveal a cautious attitude, highlighting the need for management institutions to address student concerns to enhance AI integration in branding practices
Discussion
MBA students hold mixed views on AI in branding, acknowledging its potential for personalization and customer loyalty while hesitating due to limited exposure (Clark et al., 2020). AI enhances data-driven decisions, but ethical data management is essential to maintain trust. Challenges such as infrastructure gaps and AI expertise persist, but transparency can strengthen brand identity (John & Senith, 2013). Businesses must leverage AI to automate tasks, enhance efficiency, and analyze consumer behaviour for strategic marketing (Zarei et al., 2018; Reeves & Deimler, 2012; Davenport & Ronanki, 2018). Adaptability is crucial for market competitiveness.
Managerial Implications
Educational institutions should actively integrate AI into branding curricula by fostering industry collaborations, conducting hands-on workshops, and emphasizing ethical data management (Le et al., 2023). The inclusion of AI-driven tools in MBA programs can significantly enhance both marketing and operational strategies, providing students with real-world applications and competitive skills. AI-powered analytics can help institutions refine their branding strategies, personalize student experiences, and optimize recruitment efforts. Furthermore, AI-based tools can improve decision-making in areas such as admissions, career counseling, and alumni engagement.
By partnering with businesses that use AI in marketing and branding, universities can expose students to emerging trends, ensuring they gain practical insights. Additionally, ethical considerations surrounding AI—such as data privacy, bias mitigation, and responsible AI usage—must be incorporated into curricula to develop future managers who can leverage AI while maintaining ethical integrity.
Theoretical Implications
This study underscores the critical role of student perceptions in AI adoption within educational branding. While AI has the potential to enhance learning experiences and institutional marketing, students' willingness to accept and trust AI-driven interventions is crucial. Future research should delve deeper into the psychological factors influencing AI trust, skepticism, and resistance (P.K. Theodoridis, D.C. Gkikas,2019).
Cognitive biases, familiarity with AI, perceived risks, and the human-AI interaction experience all play a role in determining whether students embrace AI-driven processes. Additionally, examining generational differences in AI acceptance—such as how Gen Z, Millennials, and older cohorts perceive AI in education—can offer valuable insights for both academia and industry. Research could also explore the impact of AI transparency, explainability, and user control on trust-building.
Policy Implications
To ensure AI readiness among graduates, curriculum reforms must integrate AI concepts, digital marketing analytics, and technology management (Lim et al., 2020). Business schools should design AI-focused courses that cover applications in branding, consumer behavior, and strategic management. (Brockmann, H., & Wilhelm, A. 2022).
Moreover, institutions must create policies that support AI training for faculty, ensuring educators can effectively incorporate AI tools into teaching methodologies. Also, Hannan, E., & Liu, S. (2023) says professional development programs should be established to help faculty stay updated with AI advancements. Additionally, academia-industry collaboration should be actively encouraged through initiatives such as AI-driven research projects, corporate-sponsored AI labs, and guest lectures from industry experts. Policies should promote data-sharing agreements, ethical AI governance, and funding opportunities to facilitate AI adoption in business education.
By embedding AI into curricula, enhancing faculty training, and fostering partnerships with industry leaders, educational institutions can equip students with the necessary skills to thrive in AI-driven business environments
Challenges
The integration of AI in education faces several challenges, primarily concerning security, technological gaps, resistance to change, ethical concerns, and maintaining a human-AI balance. Ensuring data privacy is critical, as AI systems rely on personal data, raising security concerns. Many institutions lack the necessary AI infrastructure, creating disparities in access. Additionally, educators may resist AI adoption, fearing it could replace human elements in teaching. Ethical concerns arise from AI biases in training data, potentially leading to unfair outcomes. Lastly, while AI enhances efficiency, it cannot replace the emotional support and mentorship provided by teachers, highlighting the need for a balanced approach.
Conclusion & Future Research
AI has immense potential to reshape branding strategies in education, but its success depends on overcoming student skepticism through awareness and engagement. Institutions must proactively educate students on AI’s benefits, demonstrate its real-world applications, and address ethical concerns such as data privacy and bias. Future research should focus on how AI adoption varies across different educational settings, how student perceptions evolve, and the ethical challenges in AI-driven branding. By fostering a culture of trust and responsible AI usage, institutions can effectively integrate AI into their branding efforts while ensuring transparency and inclusivity.
Authors Declaration
References:
Aaker, D. A. (2009). Managing brand equity. Simon & Schuster
Abbas, N., Whitfield, J., Atwell, E., Bowman, H., Pickard, T., & Walker, A. (2022). Online chat and chatbots to enhance mature student engagement in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 41(3), 308-326.
Abdullah, Z., Ramlan, M. F. H., Sabran, M. S., & Alsagoff, S. A. S. (2014). Towards a university branding: The effect of self-efficacy on student development in a major higher education institution. Jurnal Personalia Pelajar.
Adiguna, M. A., & Kom, M. (2023). Brand reputation monitoring system based on sentiment analysis using the k-nearest neighbor method. Jupik: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu komputer, 1(1).
Agersborg, C., Månsson, I., & Roth, E. (2020). Brand Management and Artificial Intelligence-A World of Man Plus Machine-A qualitative study exploring how Artificial Intelligence can contribute to Brand Management in the B2C sector.
Antonova, O. (2023). Advertising as a Tool for Forming the Brand of Higher Education Institutions in Modern Conditions. Law Rev. Kyiv UL, 89.
Arief, N. N., & Pangestu, A. B. (2022). Perception and sentiment analysis on empathic brand initiative during the Covid-19 pandemic: Indonesia perspective. Journal of Creative Communications, 17(2), 162-178.
Arora, S., & Thota, S. R. (2024). Using Artificial Intelligence with Big Data Analytics for Targeted Marketing Campaigns. no. June.
Ashtari, N., Bunt, A., McGrenere, J., Nebeling, M., & Chilana, P. K. (2020, April). Creating augmented and virtual reality applications: Current practices, challenges, and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1-13).
Bagai, R., & Mane, V. (2024). Designing an AI-powered mentorship platform for professional development: opportunities and challenges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.20233.
Baratelli, G., & Colleoni, E. (2022). Does artificial intelligence (AI) enabled recruitment improve employer branding?. International Journal of Business and Management.
Binhammad, M., Alqaydi, S., Othman, A., & Abuljadayel, L. H. (2024). The Role of AI in Cyber Security: Safeguarding Digital Identity. Journal of Information Security, 15(02), 245-278.
Black, J. (2008). The branding of higher education. Greensboro, NC: SEM Works.
Black, J.S., Ferolie, J. (2019), Marketing AI recruitment: The next phase in job application and selection. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 215-222
Brockmann, H., & Wilhelm, A. (2022). The Generative AI Revolution and its Impact on Marketing.
Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021). AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research. Journal of Business Research, 127, 85-95.
C.M. Marinchak, E. Forrest, B. Hoanca(2018), Artificial intelligence: redefining marketing management and the customer experience, Int. J. E Enterpren. Innovat. 8 (2) (2018) 14–24.
C.M. Marinchak, E. Forrest, B. Hoanca(2018), The impact of artificial intelligence and virtual personal assistants on marketing, in: Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, fourth ed.IGI Global, 2018, pp. 5748–5756.
Campbell, C., Sands, S., Ferraro, C., Tsao, H. Y. J., & Mavrommatis, A. (2020). From data to action: How marketers can leverage AI. Business horizons, 63(2), 227-243.
Cantú-Ortiz, F. J., Galeano Sánchez, N., Garrido, L., Terashima-Marin, H., & Brena, R. F. (2020). An artificial intelligence educational strategy for the digital transformation. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 1195-1209.
Cheng, Y., & Jiang, H. (2022). Customer–brand relationship in the era of artificial intelligence: understanding the role of chatbot marketing efforts. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(2), 252-264
Chourasia, B. (2024). Leveraging AI for Branding Strategy in Service Marketing of Hotels. In Integrating AI-Driven Technologies Into Service Marketing (pp. 439-450). IGI Global.
Clark, P., Chapleo, C., & Suomi, K. (2020). Branding higher education: an exploration of the role of internal branding on middle management in a university rebrand. Tertiary Education and Management, 26(2), 131-149.
Clarke, R. (2019). Principles and business processes for responsible AI. Computer Law & Security Review, 35(4), 410-422.
Curtis, T., Abratt, R., & Minor, W. (2009). Corporate brand management in higher education: the case of ERAU. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 18(6), 404-413.
Davenport, T. H., & Ronanki, R. (2018). Artificial intelligence for the real world. Harvard business review, 96(1), 108-116.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., ... & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International journal of information management, 57, 101994.
Ebaietaka, T. (2024). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing customer experience. PhD diss.
Ewer, M., Veale, R., & Quester, P. (2015, December). Virtual world, real engagement: building brand attachment via hosted brand community online events. In Looking Forward, Looking Back: Drawing on the Past to Shape the Future of Marketing: Proceedings of the 2013 World Marketing Congress (pp. 845-848). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Gade, J. K. (2014). Higher Education Branding (Doctoral dissertation, Master Thesis), Copenhagen business school).
Gao, Y., & Liu, H. (2023). Artificial intelligence-enabled personalization in interactive marketing: a customer journey perspective. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17(5), 663-680.
Garipağaoğlu, B. Ç. (2016). Branding in higher education: A case study from Turkey. Higher Education Policy, 29, 254-271.
Grewal, D., Hulland, J., Kopalle, P.K., Karahanna, E. (2020), The future of technology and marketing: A multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48, 1-8.
Hannan, E., & Liu, S. (2023). AI: new source of competitiveness in higher education. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 33(2), 265-279.
Hayes, J. L., Britt, B. C., Evans, W., Rush, S. W., Towery, N. A., & Adamson, A. C. (2021). Can social media listening platforms’ artificial intelligence be trusted? Examining the accuracy of Crimson Hexagon’s (now Brandwatch Consumer Research’s) AI-Driven analyses. Journal of advertising, 50(1), 81-91.
Hidayat, A. F., Suwawi, D. D. J., & Laksitowening, K. A. (2020, June). Learning content recommendations on personalized learning environment using collaborative filtering method. In 2020 8th International Conference on information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Hong, M., & Hardy, I. (2022). China’s higher education branding: Study in China as an emerging national brand. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 1-21.
Hubert, A. (2014). Increasing efficiency of sport’s event companies by implementing lean management & lean thinking across the processes defined by the SCOR model:: OC Sport, a case of Sport Event Business Company.
John, D. S. F., & Senith, M. S. (2013). Factor branding in selection of higher educational institutions in India. Journal of Business and Management, 9(5), 45-50.
Kärnä, S., & Julin, P. (2015). A framework for measuring student and staff satisfaction with university campus facilities. Quality Assurance in Education, 23(1), 47-66.
Karwal, S. (2015). Digital marketing handbook: a guide to search engine optimization, pay per click marketing, email marketing, content marketing, social media marketing. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
Keller, K. L. & Swaminathan, V. (2019). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity. Pearson Education.
Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424.
Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Venkatesan, R., & Lecinski, J. (2019). Understanding the role of artificial intelligence in personalized engagement marketing. California Management Review, 61(4), 135-155.
Lim, W. M., Jee, T. W., & De Run, E. C. (2020). Strategic brand management for higher education institutions with graduate degree programs: empirical insights from the higher education marketing mix. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 28(3), 225-245.
Liudmyla, B. A., Mouloudj, K., Rasulova, A. M., & Tkachuk, T. M. (2024). Viral Content in Event Management of Hospitality and Socio-Cultural Activities. In New Technologies in Virtual and Hybrid Events (pp. 228-257). IGI Global.
Machireddy, J. R., Rachakatla, S. K., & Ravichandran, P. (2021). Leveraging AI and Machine Learning for Data-Driven Business Strategy: A Comprehensive Framework for Analytics Integration. African Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Sustainable Development, 1(2), 12-150.
Machireddy, J. R., Rachakatla, S. K., & Ravichandran, P. (2021). AI-Driven Business Analytics for Financial Forecasting: Integrating Data Warehousing with Predictive Models. Journal of Machine Learning in Pharmaceutical Research, 1(2), 1-24.
Maedche, A., Legner, C., Benlian, A., Berger, B., Gimpel, H., Hess, T., ... & Söllner, M. (2019). AI-based digital assistants: Opportunities, threats, and research perspectives. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 61, 535-544.
Makosa, S. (2024). Brand Management Driven by Artificial Intelligence.
Mallik, D. A. Education Technology in Digital Age-A study on Classroom learning for future. About the Editors, 72.
Mallik, D. A., & Aithal, P. S. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Emerging Educational Technology in MBA Programs: Enhancing Brand Equity through Virtual Reality. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 9(1), 216-238.
Mandal, P. (2022). Future of Ai-Driven Marketing in B2b Automotive Ancillary Companies: Mumbai Industrial Areas. Journal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences, 409-415.
Mohanty, B., & Mishra, S. (2023). Role of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Fraud Detection. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 27(S4).
Musaiqer, H. H., & Hamdan, A. (2023). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Brand Building: A Review. Emerging Trends and Innovation in Business and Finance, 307-318.
Nasser, B. S. A., & Abu-Naser, S. S. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Digital Media: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Oprea, M. (2011). A university knowledge management tool for academic research activity evaluation. Informatica Economica, 15(3), 58.
Oyekunle, D., & Boohene, D. (2024). Digital transformation potential: The role of artificial intelligence in business. International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof. Bus. Rev., 9(3), 1.
Oyeniyi, L. D., Ugochukwu, C. E., & Mhlongo, N. Z. (2024). Transforming financial planning with AI-driven analysis: A review and application insights. Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(4), 626-647.
P.K. Theodoridis, D.C. Gkikas(2019), How artificial intelligence affects digital marketing, in: Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism, Springer, Cham, 2019, pp. 1319–1327.
Pazzani, M. J., & Billsus, D. (2007). Content-based recommendation systems. In The adaptive web: methods and strategies of web personalization (pp. 325-341). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
PEIRIS, M. S. (2022). AI-driven optimization techniques for cloud computing: enhancing performance, efficiency, and reliability. International Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Applications, 6(12), 11-20.
Popescu, A. I. (2012). Branding Cities as Educational Centres. The Role of Higher Education Institutions. Management & marketing, 7(3).
Raitaluoto, T. (2023) “How businesses can use ChatGPT for content marketing”: https://www.markettailor.io/blog/how-businesses-can-usechatgpt-for-content-marketing
Rajendran, R. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Branding in Educational Services Sector-Examining the Determinants of Brand Equity amongst Gen Z. MS Ramaiah Management Review ISSN (Print)-0975-7988, 12(02).
Rane, N., Choudhary, S., & Rane, J. (2023). Hyper-personalization for enhancing customer loyalty and satisfaction in Customer Relationship Management (CRM) systems. Available at SSRN 4641044.
Reeves, M., & Deimler, M. (2012). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Own the Future: 50 Ways to Win from the Boston Consulting Group, 19-26.
Saaida, M. B. (2023). AI-Driven transformations in higher education: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Educational Research and Studies, 5(1), 29-36.
Sabbar, A., & Nygren Gustafsson, L. (2021). The impact of AI on branding elements: Opportunities and challenges as seen by branding and IT specialists.
Sankar, J. G. (2024). AI-Driven Marketing Success Stories: A Case Note of Industry Pioneers. In AI-Driven Marketing Research and Data Analytics (pp. 48-66). IGI Global.
Sathyakala Higher educational institutes as learning organizations for employer branding. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(5), 265-276.
Sekarini, S., & Selvabaskar, S. (2024). AI-Powered Branding: Enhancing Consumer Experience in Emerging Markets. In Integrating AI-Driven Technologies Into Service Marketing (pp. 19-48). IGI Global.
Serban, C., & Vescan, A. (2019, August). Advances in designing a student-centered learning process using cutting-edge methods, tools, and artificial intelligence: an e-learning platform. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International workshop on education through advanced software engineering and artificial intelligence (pp. 39-45).
Sheth, J. N., Jain, V., Roy, G., & Chakraborty, A. (2022). AI-driven banking services: the next frontier for a personalised experience in the emerging market. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(6), 1248-1271.
Shin, D., He, S., Lee, G. M., Whinston, A. B., Cetintas, S., & Lee, K. C. (2020). Enhancing social media analysis with visual data analytics: A deep learning approach (pp. 1459-1492). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SSRN.
Shoaib, M., Sayed, N., Singh, J., Shafi, J., Khan, S., & Ali, F. (2024). AI student success predictor: Enhancing personalized learning in campus management systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 158, 108301.
Soe, T. H., & Slavkovik, M. (2021). AI video editing tools. want and how far is AI from delivering them.
Spanos, M. (2021). Brand storytelling in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Brand Strategy, 10(1), 6-13.
Stavrakantonakis, I., Gagiu, A. E., Kasper, H., Toma, I., & Thalhammer, A. (2012). An approach for evaluation of social media monitoring tools. Common Value Management, 52(1), 52-64.
Sterne, J. (2017). for Marketing Wiley & SAS Business.
Stone, M., Aravopoulou, E., Ekinci, Y., Evans, G., Hobbs, M., Labib, A., ... & Machtynger, L. (2020). Artificial intelligence (AI) in strategic marketing decision-making: a research agenda. The Bottom Line, 33(2), 183-200.
Tahir, M. A. (2024). Revolutionizing International Cargo Transportation: A Data-Driven Strategy for Fleet Management Optimization and Workforce Efficiency (Master's thesis).
Tarafdar, M., Beath, C. M., & Ross, J. W. (2019). Using AI to enhance business operations. MIT Sloan Management Review, 60(4), 37-44.
V.D. Soni(2020), Emerging roles of artificial intelligence in eCommerce, Int. J. Trend Scientific Res. Dev. 4 (5) (2020) 223–225.
Väliverronen, E., Sihvonen, T., Laaksonen, S. M., & Koskela, M. (2022). Branding the “wow-academy”: The risks of promotional culture and quasi-corporate communication in higher education. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(3), 493-513.
Vasundhara, S., Venkatesh, K. S., Manimegalai, V., Sundharesalingam, P., Sathyakala, S., & Boopathi, S. (2024). AI-Powered Marketing Revolutionizing Customer Engagement Through Innovative Strategies. In Cases on AI Ethics in Business (pp. 21-46). IGI Global.
Venkateswaran, P. S., Dominic, M. L., Agarwal, S., Oberai, H., Anand, I., & Rajest, S. S. (2024). The role of artificial intelligence (AI) in enhancing marketing and customer loyalty. In Data-Driven Intelligent Business Sustainability (pp. 32-47). IGI Global.
Vinutha, M. S., & Padma, M. C. (2023). Insights into search engine optimization using natural language processing and machine learning. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 14(2).
Viswanath Reddy, K., Sreenivas, T., & Lavanya, G. (2023, November). Role of AI in enhancing brand equity. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2821, No. 1). AIP Publishing.Literature Review and Conceptual Framework
West, A., Clifford, J., & Atkinson, D. (2018). " Alexa, build me a brand" An Investigation into the impact of Artificial Intelligence on Branding. The Business & Management Review, 9(3), 321-330.
Wierenga, B. (2010). Marketing and artificial intelligence: Great opportunities, reluctant partners. In In Marketing intelligent systems using soft computing.
Yeti̇şensoy, O., & Karaduman, H. (2024). The effect of AI-powered chatbots in social studies education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-35.
Zarei, A., Feiz, D., & Akbarzadeh Pasha, M. (2018). Thematic Analysis Method Application in Recognizing Brand Agility. Quarterly Journal of Brand Management, 4(4), 79-112
Zykun, N., Zoska, Y., Bessarab, A., Voronova, V., Kyiashko, Y., & Fayvishenko, D. (2020). Branding as a social communication technology for managing consumer behavior. International Journal of Management (IJM), 11(6), 1027-1037.
Буднікевич, І. М., & Бастраков, Д. А. (2024). Marketing Technologies of Image Formation and Brand Afforcement of Higher Education Institutions. Time Description of Economic Reforms, (1), 93-101.