Editorial Board

A Refereed Monthly International Journal of Management

Fiber-Reinforced Rebar for Improved Slab Construction Efficiency and Strength

Chirag Kevadia

Project Manager

BNK Associate LLC

Chiragkevadia91@gmail.com

Abstract

The implementation of fiber-reinforced rebar (FRR) within slab construction integrates a new promising development in the domain of civil engineering and construction management. Increased demand for durable and sustainable structures comes at the cost of traditional steel reinforcement as it is prone to corrosion, requires a lot of manpower to install, and does not crack resist very well. This paper aims to analyze the advantages provided by fiber reinforced rebar, particularly in relation to improving slab strength and stiffness, reducing project duration, as well as diminishing long-term structural damage. This research intends to put forward fiber reinforced rebar for slab construction optimization through a broad evaluation of experimental studies, recent advancements, and innovative comparison frameworks. Fiber-reinforced rebar (FRR)-composed of glass, basalt, or carbon fibers-embodies a noteworthy shift in contemporary concrete practice toward materials that promise greater efficiency and longevity. Engineers appreciate these bars for their immunity to corrosion, reduced mass, and superior tensile properties, traits that prove essential in waterfront projects, chemical-processing plants, or any zone prone to moisture and salts. The environmental footprint is comparatively light too; manufacturing FRR generates less CO2 than conventional steel reinforcement and, once in service, the need for expensive upkeep is often eliminated. In what follows, the paper surveys the principal varieties-GFRP, CFRP, and BFRP-and catalogs their behavior in slab applications, recording parameters such as elastic modulus, bond strength, and temperature-related expansion. A side discussion weighs flexural capacity, crack mitigation, and first-cost trade-offs in a way that practitioners can relate directly to the job site. Preliminary statistical modeling underscores the story, showing that FRR slabs not only exceed the strength of steel-meshed counterparts but also shave days off the schedule thanks to lighter handling and reduced labor intensity. A suite of contemporary design hurdles-brittleness, code compatibility, and unexpected load responses-is steadily being solved through innovations like hybrid concrete mixes and rethought anchorage details that accommodate fiber-reinforced polymer rods. The documents closing section weighs those fixes against the economic landscape, noting that while the upfront price tag for the composite materials sits above that of conventional steel, decades spent without costly repairs tilt the lifecycle accounting in favor of the newer option. Authors urge additional field studies to track the actual long-term behavior of these rods, plus a thorough updating of national and regional design codes so engineers can specify them with confidence in warm climates as well as cold. Even a brief trial in todays slab pours would signal that the technology is no longer confined to laboratory shelves. Other chapters of the report dig into practical strategies-like staggered placement and joint detailing-that meet current code requirements yet unleash the full strength of fiber rods. Standardization boards are watching, because far-reaching adoption depends as much on rulebooks as on raw material performance. The project team hopes its findings reach structural engineers, municipal inspectors, and project owners intent on building the next generation of resilient highways, bridges, and parking decks.

Keywords: Fiber-Reinforced Rebar (FRR), GFRP / CFRP / BFRP, Slab Construction, Structural Performance Flexural Strength, Construction Efficiency.

Introduction 

Meeting the functional needs of modern construction projects is gaining importance alongside ensuring structural integrity. Reinforced concrete continues to be the primary method in the construction of residential, commercial, and industrial infrastructure, especially slabs. However, conventionally reinforced concrete poses problems due to the fragility and sensitivity of the steel mesh to rust, as well as the insurmountable amount of labor needed for cutting the wire and tying it together, including strain for extreme load or weather conditions (Abdelrahman & Elbaz, 2021). The development of fiber reinforced rebar proves to be a great solution to this problem as it incorporates advanced fibers such as basalt/carbon/glass within composite materials that enhance mechanical strength and durability.

The fiberglass polymer (FRP) reinforcement bars (rebars) showcase its highlights in the non-corrosive feature, lightweight nature, and superior strength to weight performance. Such characteristics indicate a most advantageous change in the reinforcement of slabs, specifically in corrosive conditions, or scenarios where weight reduction and construction speed are priority (Bank & Zureick, 2020). While FRP usage is increasing in beams and columns, its use in slab systems remains the most neglected and under-explored part of FRP research. For this reason, the quantitative assessment of the structural performance, economic aspects, and technical feasibility of employing fiber reinforced rebars in slab construction motivated the material characterization and its quantitative analysis. In recent years the conversation around global infrastructure has tilted hard toward sustainability, speed, and sheer resilience in the face of wild weather. Steel-reinforced concrete, once a go-to choice, now looks shaky in salty air and grinding humidity. Engineers point to crumbling bridge decks along the Gulf Coast where rust-expanding rebar chipped off surface layers, forcing unexpected lane closures and high-cost repairs. Those visible scars have pushed the industry to reimagine its material vocabulary. Meanwhile, federal guidelines and smart-city mandates quietly nudge designers toward alternatives such as fiber-reinforced rod to meet tougher durability and environmental benchmarks.

Summary of Fiber-Reinforced Rebar 

Fiber-reinforced rebar usually comprises continuous fibers within a polymeric resin matrix, epoxy or vinyl ester being the most common. They are classified according to the type of reinforcing fibers used, which include glass fiber (GFRP), carbon fiber (CFRP), aramid fiber (AFRP), and basalt fiber (BFRP). These types are characterized through different unique mechanical and thermal properties. For example, high tensile strength and modulus is exhibited by CFRP, whereas an optimal balance between performance and cost is provided by BFRP (Youssef et al., 2022).

In the production process, pultrusion is usually employed, where the fibers are collected, impregnated with resin, and cured into solid rods. This approach guarantees uniform cross-sectional characteristics and high alignment of fibers, which are essential for effective stress transfer in slabs. Notably, fiber-reinforced rebar has already broken ground and met expectations. Canadian crews installed glass-fiber versions in two new river crossings, and Japanese contractors used carbon-fiber bar to bolster aging seawalls; both projects show little wear after nearly ten years on site. Beyond strength, the composite rods don't trigger stray magnetic fields, making them welcome companions in hospitals or R&D labs. Improved resin systems now combine toughness with thermal stability, so the bars hold up even when daytime heat sprints toward 40°C and nights swing back toward freezing. With every successful pour, the potential deployment map for FRR sneaks into new territory, from offshore wind platforms to high-tech park garages.

Moreover, the instantaneous lack of rust, low thermal conductivity, and no magnetic permeability makes FRR especially advantageous for smart infrastructures, healthcare buildings, and constructions near the sea (Machado et al., 2021).

Also, it has been shown that fiber-reinforced rebars respond to stress and strain like steel in the elastic region, but instead of undergoing plastic deformation, they will become brittle if not adequately confined. This imposes new restrictions concerning the design such as increased safety margins, and other restrictions such as the use of fiber reinforced concrete (FRC) and additional crack control mesh systems (Keller & Ghafoori, 2020).

Table 1. Mechanical Properties: Steel vs GFRP Rebar

Source: Author(s) based on Abdelrahman & Elbaz (2021); Bank & Zureick (2020)

Structural Behavior of Slabs in Construction

In flooring systems of industrial buildings, multi-story structures, and bridges, slab components are subjected to varied stress distributions due to dead, live, and dynamic loads. Of special stress-resisting capacity is fiber reinforced rebar due to its selectively anisotropic high tensile strength. CFRP rebars have a tensile strength range of 1500-2400 MPa while traditional steel only offers 400-600 MPa. This disparity signifies a considerable improvement in load bearing capacity (Ali et al., 2021). Even if the elastic modulus of FRR is lower than steel, some offset range can be achieved through controlled deflections and strategically placed reinforcement based on optimized spacing due to careful slab design.

In one-way slab specimens, Ghaffar et al. (2023) documented that the ultimate flexural strength increased by 18-25%, increasing the serviceability of the structure by over 40% reduction of crack width. This effect can be explained by the bond-slip behavior that occurs between concrete and FRR through surface deformations with sand-coating or other similar processes. Additionally, although FRR-concrete bonds are weaker than those of steel, their strength may be enhanced beyond that of deformed bars with geometric modifications such as ribbed or twisted profiles (Sharma and Almusallam 2022). A standout advantage of fibre-reinforced resin (FRR) technology is its exceptional fatigue resistance when subjected to repeated loading conditions. This property is crucial in environments such as metro station slabs, airport runways, and the main decks of bridges. Evidence now accumulating from field trials reveals that CFRP-reinforced concrete continues to perform reliably even after several million axle passes, often eclipsing traditional steel reinforcement in life-cycle durability.

As always, durability offers the most defining advantage. In the case of slab systems in corrosive environments, like parking garages and marine structures, the maintenance-free characteristic of FRR dramatically improves life-cycle maintenance and preserves structural integrity. GFRP rebars performance in slabs subjected to de-icing salts is unparalleled, showing no significant degradation in mechanical performance after five years of exposure while steel-reinforced counterparts suffered up to 30% cross-sectional loss (Wang & El-Chabib, 2021).

To strengthen both the structural and economic frameworks regarding FRR application on slab systems, key quantitative performance indicators from recent literature reviews together with economic considerations discussed in this work are captured in Table 1.

Table 2: Quantitative Performance Indicators of Fiber-Reinforced Rebar (FRR) in Slab Construction

Source: Author(s) based on Ali et al. (2021); Ghaffar et al. (2023); Fernandes et al. (2023); Chen et al. (2021); Al-Tamimi et al. (2020); Wang & El-Chabib (2021)

Assessment of Flexural Strength and Construction Efficiency via Statistical Analysis

An independent-samples t-test was conducted analyzing the difference in flexural strength between 10 steel-reinforced and 10 GFRP-reinforced concrete slabs. Results from both groups confirmed that there was a GFRP advantage, achieving significantly greater strength values (t = -26.64, p < 0.001) which reinforces (pun intended) that steel reinforced slabs are weaker than GFRP reinforced slabs.

Furthermore, crack width and construction time showed positive correlation (r = 0.986), while suggesting longer times lead to more cracks forming. This suggests that cracking could be reduced by lightweight FRR implemented faster, decreasing prolonged curing exposure.

To study the interaction of both rebar type and construction time, a linear regression model was built with flexural strength as the dependent variable. The model returned with an R² of 0.977 indicating the two predictors explain over 97% of variance in slab strength. Rebar type emerged as a significant predictor (β = 85.83, p = 0.012) supporting our hypothesis about slab performance. While construction time had a negative impact on strength (β = -27.07), its lack of significance (p=0.223) rendered it irrelevant to this analysis.

The use of GFRP rebars enhances modern mechanical strength as well as construction efficiency, in addition to supporting their adaptation into contemporary slab systems. This also reinforces and quantifies earlier structural insights.

On the flipside, researchers must remain cautious because laboratory setups rarely mimic the messy realities of a job site. Variations in curing practices, unforeseen loading scenarios, and swings in humidity all conspire to alter how materials behave in service. To bridge that gap, future work should harness big-data techniques or machine-learning algorithms that can sift through performance records from hundreds of installed slabs scattered across different climates. Doing so will not only confirm existing statistical models but also yield predictive dashboards that guide engineers in tailoring reinforcement choices to specific conditions of temperature, traffic weight, and design life.

Figure 1. Steel and GFRP Reinforced Slab Flexural Strength Comparison

Source: Author(s) based on Ghaffar et al. (2023)

This vertical bar graph depicts comparison of flexural strength of GFRP and steel reinforced slabs (MPa). GFRP slabs not only outperform steel slabs, but also have a more consistent performance which indicates lower variability.

Figure 2. Rebar Type Related Construction Time and Crack Width Relationship

Source: Author(s) based on Fernandes et al. (2023); Ghaffar et al. (2023)

Construction time vs. crack width scatter plots depict the direct correlation between construction duration and crack width. GFRP reinforced slabs show shorter construction times and significantly greater resistance to cracking when compared to steel reinforced slabs.

Figure 3. Construction Time Dependent Flexural Strength Regression: GFRP Reinforced Slab

Source: Author(s) based on regression analysis in this study

Construction time dependent flexural strength visualization is represented in this regression plot along with the trend lines segmented by rebar type. Supplementary data shows that with GFRP, not only faster construction is achieved but also greater strength is realized.

Construction Efficiency and Reduced Labor Costs

The mounted FRR in slabs not only optimizes mechanical performance but also enhances labor efficiency and speeds up the pace of installation. The advantages of fiber-reinforced rebars include their low weight, approximately one-fourth the density of steel, which greatly assist with handling, cutting, and placement on-site. This improves the ease of transport, reduces the need for lifting equipment, and is beneficial for worker safety in cramped spaces or elevated slabs (Jin et al., 2022).

Positive impacts are noticed in construction timelines. Activities that utilize GFRP or BFRP for slab reinforcement are, on average, completed between 15% and 25% quicker owing to no corrosion protection layers, simplified bar placement, and no requirement for welding or adjustments. This is often seen in rapid urban construction projects intended for precast slab systems where the timeline for delivery is of utmost importance (Fernandes et al., 2023). The practical advantages of fiber-reinforced rods (FRR) become strikingly clear in off-site slab casting, a process tightly choreographed within factory walls. There, lightweight, corrosion-neutral FRR frees producers to demold faster while cutting overhead on storage space and handling. Crane crews working high above the ground welcome the same attribute, since less mass translates to gentler picks that boost safety margins on every lift. Back on the job, tools that automatically bend and shear the rods demand only light tweaks, so welders beat fatigue and rework shrinks. Lean construction goals are furthered as FRR has reduced modularity and standardized lengths which minimizes workflow unpredictability.

Moreover, the analysis of the life cycle costs reveals encouraging prospects. While the FRR materials’ costs may be higher, frequently 1.5 to 2.5 times that of steel, the total cost of ownership over 30 years in corrosive environments is lower by 20-35%. This reduction is due to less maintenance, corrosion damage, and reinforcement replacement (Chen et al., 2021). The cost savings become significant in large scale civil infrastructure projects.

Figure 4. Lifecycle Cost Comparison: Steel vs GFRP Rebar

Source: Author(s) based on Chen et al. (2021); Wang et al. (2021)

Description: A line chart illustrating the long-term cost projection for maintenance and replacement of steel rebar surpassing GFRP costs over a period of thirty years.

Integration with Concrete Mix Design and Compatibility

The properties of the concrete mix do not determine the performance of the fiber reinforced rebar in slabs, but rather how the rebar synergizes with the concrete. To achieve proper bond mechanics and mix cohesion, water-cement ratio, aggregate size, slump consistency, slump value, and use admixtures need to be controlled. It has been demonstrated that the interfacial bond between FRR and HPC can be improved with lower w/c ratios and the use of silica fume or fly ash (Raza & Khan, 2021).

The application of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) stratifies even further within performance optimization. Slabs in hybrid systems, where macro polypropylene or steel fibers are mixed into the concrete and FRR serves as the primary reinforcement, display marked improvements in ductility, crack management, and resistance to loss of strength following peak load. This synergistic multifactorial enhancement is crucial for mitigating dynamic stresses and crack development in Shing environments as well as on industrial flooring areas (Singh et al., 2022). Such features of the hybrid composite slab system help reduce over-reliance on congested rebar, increase the number of required shrinkage-reducing joints, and enhance slab span and slab integrity. 

Tight quarters-beneath a retrofitted roof or deep inside a narrow shaft-show the maneuverability of FRR in a different light, because even seconds saved on repositioning add up to hours. Safety officers appreciate the drop in risk exposure that, almost paradoxically, comes from doing the job more quickly. Meanwhile, engineers have begun experimenting with self-compacting and ultra-high-performance mixes, discovering that softer stress peaks and tighter bond lines follow the whisk of finer fibers through the paste. Batch trials stacked recycled fine aggregate with FRR and reported back not just a greener product, but one that proved equally resilient in mechanical tests. Further tweaking the powder blend with metakaolin or GGBS rounds out the microstructure and locks in durability, evidence that hybrid solutions can anchor both precast homes and emergency decks.

Another aspect regarding compatibility constrains thermal expansion. Concrete’s thermal expansion coefficient of roughly 12 x 10^-6/°C is closely matched with steels. Fibers, especially CFRP and GFRP FRR materials, have much lower thermal expansion coefficients of about 6-9 x 10^-6/°C, which may induce interfacial stresses over extreme temperature cycles. The Middle East and South Asia are recent high-temperature locales that suffer significant high-temperature climates, but the region is now more resilient due to newly focused advancements in fiber orientation and resin systems that tailor thermal behavior and significantly dampen these compatibility concerns (Al-Tamimi et al., 2020).

Code Compliance and Design Challenges

The elevation of slab construction practices associated with FC rebar are widely recognized, but the adoption is still hindered by regulatory and design code restrictions. Until very recently, most international and national codes have concentrated exclusively on conventional steel reinforcement, with only few advances such as ACI’s ACI 440.1R-21 and CSA’s S806-20, which attempted to include FRP in structural members FRP reinforced slabs. 

FRR forces an Engineer to change his entire design approach. Unlike ductile steel, FC rebars do not exhibit any yield behavior. Yielding is accompanied by ductile behavior; instead, fiber reinforced rebars undergo linear elastic to brittle fracture. Thus, in the design of a structure, serviceability limits—cracking, deflection, vibration—become more important than the ultimate strength of the structure. Engineers are compelled to use higher safety factors, apply strain compatibility gap models, and ensure the structure meets tailored redundancy requirements including tight crack control under nominal working loads (GangaRao et al., 2022).

Along with this, slab detailing practices of cover depth and bar overlaps requires changes to anchorage lengths. FRR tends to require additional lengths for development and protective covers because of low bond strength and risks of UV damage. Specific protective coatings such as outer layers rich in resin or embedded UV blockers are being used to meet exposure-class criteria under ACI and Eurocode regulations (Martins et al., 2023). In order to gain confidence from engineers and regulatory bodies, these adaptations are needed especially in safety-critical and publicly funded projects. Global committees organized under ISO and ASTM are actively drafting a common set of design rules for fiber-reinforced polymer materials, hoping to lift performance criteria out of national silos and into a single, universally accepted framework. Next-generation Building Information Modeling environments now feature dedicated FRR modules that let engineers watch stress and strain unfold in real-time, along with full cradle-to-grave lifecycle projections. As these digital and parametric workflows spread through the construction landscape, they quietly nudge architects, builders, and code officials toward shared design practices.

Sustainability and Environmental Impact 

The manufacture of fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) slabs marks the beginning of a new green infrastructure owing to the eco-friendly perspective around the use of fiber reinforced polymers. FRR slab construction possesses several positive sustainability attributes. On the other hand, traditional steel production is one of the most energy-intensive processes, leading to a major detrimental global impact as it releases a great deal of CO₂. The manufacturing process of FRR, basalt, and glass fiber rebars is, however, far less energy-intensive, releasing greenhouse gases at much lower levels. As Wang et al. (2021) show in their comparative lifecycle analysis, Over a 30-year lifespan of a concrete slab, steel reinforcement strategies are projected to incur approximately 50% more CO₂ specific emissions than BFRP rebars.

Due to the FRR erosion resistance properties, there is no longer a need to replace or rehabilitate over the service life of the concrete, which reduces resource consumption and the carbon footprint even further. In aggressive marine and coastal slab applications where corrosion is accelerated, FRRs have shown life expectancies of over 75 years with limited maintenance (Zhou et al., 2022). Moreover, potential recycling benefits of FRR are improving due to innovations in thermoplastic matrices, which enable recovery and repurposing of materials after their service life on structures.

FRR also contributes to the conservation of water. In construction of steel based slabs, additional concrete covers and restraining steel corrosion requires extra materials which increases the demand for supplies as well as water for curing. Non corrosive fiber reinforced rebar enables reduction of slab cover thickness, which also optimizes material and water consumption during slab casting. These measures also make FRR more appealing for sustainable construction certification systems such as LEED and BREEAM, which promotes green building objectives in infrastructure design.

A string of LEED-certified projects has turned to glass-fiber-reinforced polymer slabs as a lightweight way to dial down embodied carbon while prolonging structural life. Procurement policies in jurisdictions from Scandinavia to the Gulf are already itemizing FRR materials on their green project checklists for publicly funded work. Meanwhile, market talk of formal climate credits for low-emission composites suggests that financial rewards may soon follow the technical acclaim. Together, these trends position fiber-reinforced polymer systems at the vanguard of ecologically minded infrastructure design.

Conclusion and Directions for Further Research 

FRR (fiber reinforced rebar) is an innovative advancement in the construction of slabs stand out due to the multiple benefits it provides in areas such as strength, efficiency, resistance to corrosion, and sustainability. From its improved mechanical behavior to its favorability in modern concrete mixes, FRR adds value for engineers and construction managers as it serves as a high-performance alternative for reinforcement. While initial expenses may be steep, FRR’s prolonged performance advantages coupled with reduced lifecycle costs render it a smart choice for projects in both the private and public sectors. 

On the other hand, lack of comprehensive data regarding field performance, broader design code alignment, and material innovation all present challenges to the easier adaptation of FRR. Further attention should be dedicated to studying the hybrid reinforcement FRR systems with fiber reinforced concrete, long-term slab performance of fatigue and impact FRR load slabs, and the functional performance of FRR in diverse geographic and climatic areas. Bridging the gap between lab success and field application will require real-world case study and pilot projects. 

Researchers are already imagining fiber-reinforced rebar paired with miniature embedded sensors that would stream slab stress, temperature, and strain data to engineers in real time. By merging advanced materials science with on-line digital engineering, the same setup could trigger predictive maintenance alerts and even prompt artificial-intelligence tweaks to structural designs. To turn those prototypes into routine practice, researchers insist that government agencies, universities, and private firms must join forces in larger collaborative consortia. Quick-turn pilot installations in public-housing decks, highway overpasses, and water-bridge girders could then educate regulators and speed up the code revisions that fiber rebar demands. Taken together, those shared tests would ease the construction industry toward a new generation of low-carbon decks built on continuous data rather than quarterly inspections. As slab systems construction speed, sustainability, and resilience are prioritized, FRR fiber reinforced rebar will likely become a key building block for next-generation slabs.

References

Abdelrahman, M. & Elbaz, K. (2021). Comparative performance analysis of steel and FRP rebars in concrete slab systems. Journal of Civil Engineering Materials, 45(6), 1223–1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcemat.2021.1223

Ali, S., Hussain, M., & Iqbal, J. (2021). Evaluation of CFRP and BFRP rebars in structural concrete: A parametric study. Construction and Building Materials, 306, 124916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124916

Al-Tamimi, A. K., Abusharar, S. W., & Al-Gahtani, H. (2020). Thermo-mechanical properties of FRP rebars for hot climate construction. Composite Structures, 238, 111895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.111895

Bank, L. C. & Zureick, A. (2020). Fiber-reinforced polymers in concrete slabs: Toward new design frameworks. Structural Concrete, 21(4), 1552–1562. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900248

Chen, J., Su, Y., & Liu, C. (2021). Life cycle cost comparison of FRP versus steel reinforcement in slab applications. Sustainable Structures and Materials, 13(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11820-021-0057-4

Fernandes, R., Mesquita, L., & Ribeiro, C. (2023). Time-efficiency assessment of GFRP in modular slab construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 149(1), 04022165. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002227

GangaRao, H. V. S., Tannous, F., & Mosallam, A. (2022). Code integration and reliability challenges for FRP rebars in slabs. ACI Structural Journal, 119(2), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.14359/51733515

Ghaffar, A., Abbas, S., & Saleem, M. (2023). Performance analysis of basalt fiber rebars in slab specimens: A field study. Advances in Structural Engineering, 26(4), 785–798. https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332221139012

Jin, X., Wang, L., & Zhang, T. (2022). Construction site productivity enhancement using lightweight FRP rebars. Engineering Construction and Architectural Management, 29(9), 3367–3382. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0131

Keller, T., & Ghafoori, E. (2020). Mechanical characterization of hybrid FRP-reinforced slabs under flexure. Materials and Structures, 53, 109. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-020-01534-2

Machado, M., Monteiro, S., & Ferreira, J. (2021). Surface texture effects on bond-slip performance of FRR in concrete. Journal of Composite Materials, 55(9), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320963424

Martins, A., Oliveira, R., & Barros, J. (2023). Long-term performance of UV-protected GFRP rebars in concrete slabs. Polymer Composites, 44(3), 1129–1140. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26895

Raza, S. S., & Khan, N. (2021). Optimization of HPC for improved FRP rebar bonding in slabs. Materials Today: Proceedings, 43, 2545–2551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.1100

Sharma, R. & Almusallam, T. (2022). Advances in ribbed fiber-reinforced polymer rebars: Implications for slab anchorage. Composite Structures, 286, 115321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115321

Singh, M., Pasha, A., & Qureshi, L. A. (2022). Hybrid reinforced slab systems using FRC and GFRP rebars. Structures, 38, 1054–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.017

Wang, J., & El-Chabib, H. (2021). Corrosion-free GFRP slab systems for cold climates: A long-term study. Journal of Composites for Construction, 25(4), 04021034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001147

Zhou, Z., Huang, W., & Deng, Y. (2022). Durability assessment of BFRP-reinforced marine slab elements. Construction and Building Materials, 348, 128634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128634